Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Learning styles
View graph of relations

Learning styles: a critique

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Learning styles: a critique. / Reynolds, Michael.
In: Management Learning, Vol. 28, No. 2, 06.1997, p. 115-133.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Reynolds, M 1997, 'Learning styles: a critique', Management Learning, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507697282002

APA

Vancouver

Reynolds M. Learning styles: a critique. Management Learning. 1997 Jun;28(2):115-133. doi: 10.1177/1350507697282002

Author

Reynolds, Michael. / Learning styles : a critique. In: Management Learning. 1997 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 115-133.

Bibtex

@article{c3e49acf61ef415d876123e68d359bf4,
title = "Learning styles: a critique",
abstract = "The concept of `learning style' is virtually taken for granted in management development, in spite of considerable doubts about its validity from within cognitive psychology and education. The first part of this paper summarizes research that is critical of `learning styles', particularly in the form which predominates within management development and introduces the alternative concept of learning strategy, which is rarely encountered in this field. The second part of the paper develops a critique of learning style theory from a critical education perspective, raising even more significant concerns that in decontextualizing learning the concept of style may provide a discriminatory basis for dealing with difference in gender or race.",
author = "Michael Reynolds",
year = "1997",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/1350507697282002",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "115--133",
journal = "Management Learning",
issn = "1350-5076",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning styles

T2 - a critique

AU - Reynolds, Michael

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - The concept of `learning style' is virtually taken for granted in management development, in spite of considerable doubts about its validity from within cognitive psychology and education. The first part of this paper summarizes research that is critical of `learning styles', particularly in the form which predominates within management development and introduces the alternative concept of learning strategy, which is rarely encountered in this field. The second part of the paper develops a critique of learning style theory from a critical education perspective, raising even more significant concerns that in decontextualizing learning the concept of style may provide a discriminatory basis for dealing with difference in gender or race.

AB - The concept of `learning style' is virtually taken for granted in management development, in spite of considerable doubts about its validity from within cognitive psychology and education. The first part of this paper summarizes research that is critical of `learning styles', particularly in the form which predominates within management development and introduces the alternative concept of learning strategy, which is rarely encountered in this field. The second part of the paper develops a critique of learning style theory from a critical education perspective, raising even more significant concerns that in decontextualizing learning the concept of style may provide a discriminatory basis for dealing with difference in gender or race.

U2 - 10.1177/1350507697282002

DO - 10.1177/1350507697282002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 115

EP - 133

JO - Management Learning

JF - Management Learning

SN - 1350-5076

IS - 2

ER -