Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Lesbian spanners: A Re-appraisal of UK Consensu...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • LLR.BDSM

    Rights statement: 12m

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.01 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/50

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Lesbian spanners: A Re-appraisal of UK Consensual Sadomasochism Laws: a re-appraisal of UK consensual sadomasochism laws

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Lesbian spanners: A Re-appraisal of UK Consensual Sadomasochism Laws: a re-appraisal of UK consensual sadomasochism laws. / Beresford, Sarah Ellen.
In: Liverpool Law Review, 13.06.2016.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{67b24c23f9a44028bbb7738e1ddd03d2,
title = "Lesbian spanners: A Re-appraisal of UK Consensual Sadomasochism Laws: a re-appraisal of UK consensual sadomasochism laws",
abstract = "There continues to be legal invisibility of lesbians as sexual beings; in particular, for those lesbians who engage in BDSM. A cursory glance at work both within and outside of the academy gives the impression of increased social and legal acceptability for those who engage in BDSM. However, I suggest that this acceptance is illusory and that instead, gay men who engage in BDSM experience increased legal supervision and increased invisibility for lesbians. These issues are examined in the context of two seemingly disparate legal events. The first is the 30 year anniversary of Operation Spanner and the second is the introduction of the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014. Amongst other things, the 2014 Regulations criminalise the portrayal of female ejaculation (but not male). Given this criminalisation of certain kinds of female sexual pleasure, the potentiality to significantly adversely impact upon lesbians is clear. 2017 will be the 30 year anniversary of Operation Spanner and the subsequent focus has been primarily upon gay male BDSM. I speculate as to the possible legal reaction(s) to a lesbian 'spanner' BDSM event. I speculate as to the legal reactions to an all-female BDSM dungeon.",
keywords = "Lesbian, Law, BDSM, Operation Spanner",
author = "Beresford, {Sarah Ellen}",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s10991-016-9182-2",
language = "English",
journal = "Liverpool Law Review",
issn = "0144-932X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lesbian spanners: A Re-appraisal of UK Consensual Sadomasochism Laws

T2 - a re-appraisal of UK consensual sadomasochism laws

AU - Beresford, Sarah Ellen

PY - 2016/6/13

Y1 - 2016/6/13

N2 - There continues to be legal invisibility of lesbians as sexual beings; in particular, for those lesbians who engage in BDSM. A cursory glance at work both within and outside of the academy gives the impression of increased social and legal acceptability for those who engage in BDSM. However, I suggest that this acceptance is illusory and that instead, gay men who engage in BDSM experience increased legal supervision and increased invisibility for lesbians. These issues are examined in the context of two seemingly disparate legal events. The first is the 30 year anniversary of Operation Spanner and the second is the introduction of the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014. Amongst other things, the 2014 Regulations criminalise the portrayal of female ejaculation (but not male). Given this criminalisation of certain kinds of female sexual pleasure, the potentiality to significantly adversely impact upon lesbians is clear. 2017 will be the 30 year anniversary of Operation Spanner and the subsequent focus has been primarily upon gay male BDSM. I speculate as to the possible legal reaction(s) to a lesbian 'spanner' BDSM event. I speculate as to the legal reactions to an all-female BDSM dungeon.

AB - There continues to be legal invisibility of lesbians as sexual beings; in particular, for those lesbians who engage in BDSM. A cursory glance at work both within and outside of the academy gives the impression of increased social and legal acceptability for those who engage in BDSM. However, I suggest that this acceptance is illusory and that instead, gay men who engage in BDSM experience increased legal supervision and increased invisibility for lesbians. These issues are examined in the context of two seemingly disparate legal events. The first is the 30 year anniversary of Operation Spanner and the second is the introduction of the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014. Amongst other things, the 2014 Regulations criminalise the portrayal of female ejaculation (but not male). Given this criminalisation of certain kinds of female sexual pleasure, the potentiality to significantly adversely impact upon lesbians is clear. 2017 will be the 30 year anniversary of Operation Spanner and the subsequent focus has been primarily upon gay male BDSM. I speculate as to the possible legal reaction(s) to a lesbian 'spanner' BDSM event. I speculate as to the legal reactions to an all-female BDSM dungeon.

KW - Lesbian

KW - Law

KW - BDSM

KW - Operation Spanner

U2 - 10.1007/s10991-016-9182-2

DO - 10.1007/s10991-016-9182-2

M3 - Journal article

JO - Liverpool Law Review

JF - Liverpool Law Review

SN - 0144-932X

ER -