Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Let 'em talk!

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Let 'em talk!: a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Let 'em talk! a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. / Snook, Brent; Luther, Kirk; Quinlan, Heather et al.
In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 39, No. 10, 01.10.2012, p. 1328-1339.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Snook, B, Luther, K, Quinlan, H & Milne, R 2012, 'Let 'em talk! a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons', Criminal Justice and Behavior, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1328-1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812449216

APA

Snook, B., Luther, K., Quinlan, H., & Milne, R. (2012). Let 'em talk! a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1328-1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812449216

Vancouver

Snook B, Luther K, Quinlan H, Milne R. Let 'em talk! a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2012 Oct 1;39(10):1328-1339. Epub 2012 Jul 9. doi: 10.1177/0093854812449216

Author

Snook, Brent ; Luther, Kirk ; Quinlan, Heather et al. / Let 'em talk! a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. In: Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 10. pp. 1328-1339.

Bibtex

@article{159d388f2bb348f8a48f4442a842d1d0,
title = "Let 'em talk!: a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons",
abstract = "The real-life questioning practices of Canadian police officers were examined. Specifically, 80 transcripts of police interviews with suspects and accused persons were coded for the type of questions asked, the length of interviewee response to each question, the proportion of words spoken by interviewer(s) and interviewee, and whether or not a free narrative was requested. Results showed that, on average, less than 1% of the questions asked in an interview were open-ended, and that closed yes–no and probing questions composed approximately 40% and 30% of the questions asked, respectively. The long- est interviewee responses were obtained from open-ended questions, followed by multiple and probing question types. A free narrative was requested in approximately 14% of the interviews. The 80–20 talking rule was violated in every interview. The implications of these findings for reforming investigative interviewing of suspects and accused persons are discussed.",
keywords = "investigative interviewing, interrogations, police, best practices, training, question types",
author = "Brent Snook and Kirk Luther and Heather Quinlan and Rebecca Milne",
year = "2012",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093854812449216",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1328--1339",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Let 'em talk!

T2 - a field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons

AU - Snook, Brent

AU - Luther, Kirk

AU - Quinlan, Heather

AU - Milne, Rebecca

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - The real-life questioning practices of Canadian police officers were examined. Specifically, 80 transcripts of police interviews with suspects and accused persons were coded for the type of questions asked, the length of interviewee response to each question, the proportion of words spoken by interviewer(s) and interviewee, and whether or not a free narrative was requested. Results showed that, on average, less than 1% of the questions asked in an interview were open-ended, and that closed yes–no and probing questions composed approximately 40% and 30% of the questions asked, respectively. The long- est interviewee responses were obtained from open-ended questions, followed by multiple and probing question types. A free narrative was requested in approximately 14% of the interviews. The 80–20 talking rule was violated in every interview. The implications of these findings for reforming investigative interviewing of suspects and accused persons are discussed.

AB - The real-life questioning practices of Canadian police officers were examined. Specifically, 80 transcripts of police interviews with suspects and accused persons were coded for the type of questions asked, the length of interviewee response to each question, the proportion of words spoken by interviewer(s) and interviewee, and whether or not a free narrative was requested. Results showed that, on average, less than 1% of the questions asked in an interview were open-ended, and that closed yes–no and probing questions composed approximately 40% and 30% of the questions asked, respectively. The long- est interviewee responses were obtained from open-ended questions, followed by multiple and probing question types. A free narrative was requested in approximately 14% of the interviews. The 80–20 talking rule was violated in every interview. The implications of these findings for reforming investigative interviewing of suspects and accused persons are discussed.

KW - investigative interviewing

KW - interrogations

KW - police

KW - best practices

KW - training

KW - question types

U2 - 10.1177/0093854812449216

DO - 10.1177/0093854812449216

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 1328

EP - 1339

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 10

ER -