Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Letraset Zombies?

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Letraset Zombies?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Letraset Zombies? / Shove, Elizabeth.
In: Facilities, Vol. 9, No. 8, 01.01.1991, p. 9-12.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Shove, E 1991, 'Letraset Zombies?', Facilities, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002155

APA

Shove, E. (1991). Letraset Zombies? Facilities, 9(8), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002155

Vancouver

Shove E. Letraset Zombies? Facilities. 1991 Jan 1;9(8):9-12. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000002155

Author

Shove, Elizabeth. / Letraset Zombies?. In: Facilities. 1991 ; Vol. 9, No. 8. pp. 9-12.

Bibtex

@article{23b9a7b752b04db6b88b6b61d1de12c5,
title = "Letraset Zombies?",
abstract = "How much note do designers take of users′ needs in designing buildings? Users apparently are treated as just that, reactive in their use of whatever is provided for them. What is lacking in the minds of designers is an appreciation of the proactive stance of users from the sociological viewpoint vis‐{\`a}‐vis their relationship with the buildings in which they work. Post‐occupancy evaluations which have traditionally embraced the reactive should now take more cognisance of the proactive aspect of the people/buildings relationship and rescue the occupants from the zombie‐like state to which they have been condemned.",
author = "Elizabeth Shove",
year = "1991",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/EUM0000000002155",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "9--12",
journal = "Facilities",
issn = "0263-2772",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Letraset Zombies?

AU - Shove, Elizabeth

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - How much note do designers take of users′ needs in designing buildings? Users apparently are treated as just that, reactive in their use of whatever is provided for them. What is lacking in the minds of designers is an appreciation of the proactive stance of users from the sociological viewpoint vis‐à‐vis their relationship with the buildings in which they work. Post‐occupancy evaluations which have traditionally embraced the reactive should now take more cognisance of the proactive aspect of the people/buildings relationship and rescue the occupants from the zombie‐like state to which they have been condemned.

AB - How much note do designers take of users′ needs in designing buildings? Users apparently are treated as just that, reactive in their use of whatever is provided for them. What is lacking in the minds of designers is an appreciation of the proactive stance of users from the sociological viewpoint vis‐à‐vis their relationship with the buildings in which they work. Post‐occupancy evaluations which have traditionally embraced the reactive should now take more cognisance of the proactive aspect of the people/buildings relationship and rescue the occupants from the zombie‐like state to which they have been condemned.

U2 - 10.1108/EUM0000000002155

DO - 10.1108/EUM0000000002155

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:70350484459

VL - 9

SP - 9

EP - 12

JO - Facilities

JF - Facilities

SN - 0263-2772

IS - 8

ER -