Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Limits to and opportunities for scaling partici...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Limits to and opportunities for scaling participation: lessons from three city-wide urban poor networks in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Limits to and opportunities for scaling participation: lessons from three city-wide urban poor networks in Dhaka, Bangladesh. / Cawood, Sally.
In: Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.10.2021, p. 396-412.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cawood S. Limits to and opportunities for scaling participation: lessons from three city-wide urban poor networks in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environment and Urbanization. 2021 Oct 1;33(2):396-412. Epub 2021 Jul 9. doi: 10.1177/09562478211026253

Author

Bibtex

@article{cd9dfd43a5034179b6f29b462302fc42,
title = "Limits to and opportunities for scaling participation: lessons from three city-wide urban poor networks in Dhaka, Bangladesh",
abstract = "In Dhaka, three urban poor networks play a central role in advocating for the rights and entitlements of low-income settlement residents. Despite their numerous achievements, this article outlines how attempts to scale participation via these networks are limited by three overlapping state–civil society processes: (1) the politicization and increased monitoring of non-governmental organizations (NGOs); (2) shifting donor preferences towards service delivery and the creation of new community-based organizations (CBOs); and (3) the ongoing dominance and paternalism of NGOs towards low-income settlement residents. By situating these findings within existing understandings of in/formal governance and political participation, it can be argued that attempts to scale may struggle to evade or transform deep structures of dependency, patronage and intermediation. Recognizing that scaling can and does occur under these conditions, the article outlines opportunities to support the city-wide networks and alternative forms of organizing, to address pressing needs and priorities.",
keywords = "Bangladesh, civil society, community-based organizations, low-income settlements, non-governmental organizations, political patronage, state",
author = "Sally Cawood",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/09562478211026253",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "396--412",
journal = "Environment and Urbanization",
issn = "0956-2478",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limits to and opportunities for scaling participation

T2 - lessons from three city-wide urban poor networks in Dhaka, Bangladesh

AU - Cawood, Sally

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - In Dhaka, three urban poor networks play a central role in advocating for the rights and entitlements of low-income settlement residents. Despite their numerous achievements, this article outlines how attempts to scale participation via these networks are limited by three overlapping state–civil society processes: (1) the politicization and increased monitoring of non-governmental organizations (NGOs); (2) shifting donor preferences towards service delivery and the creation of new community-based organizations (CBOs); and (3) the ongoing dominance and paternalism of NGOs towards low-income settlement residents. By situating these findings within existing understandings of in/formal governance and political participation, it can be argued that attempts to scale may struggle to evade or transform deep structures of dependency, patronage and intermediation. Recognizing that scaling can and does occur under these conditions, the article outlines opportunities to support the city-wide networks and alternative forms of organizing, to address pressing needs and priorities.

AB - In Dhaka, three urban poor networks play a central role in advocating for the rights and entitlements of low-income settlement residents. Despite their numerous achievements, this article outlines how attempts to scale participation via these networks are limited by three overlapping state–civil society processes: (1) the politicization and increased monitoring of non-governmental organizations (NGOs); (2) shifting donor preferences towards service delivery and the creation of new community-based organizations (CBOs); and (3) the ongoing dominance and paternalism of NGOs towards low-income settlement residents. By situating these findings within existing understandings of in/formal governance and political participation, it can be argued that attempts to scale may struggle to evade or transform deep structures of dependency, patronage and intermediation. Recognizing that scaling can and does occur under these conditions, the article outlines opportunities to support the city-wide networks and alternative forms of organizing, to address pressing needs and priorities.

KW - Bangladesh

KW - civil society

KW - community-based organizations

KW - low-income settlements

KW - non-governmental organizations

KW - political patronage

KW - state

U2 - 10.1177/09562478211026253

DO - 10.1177/09562478211026253

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 396

EP - 412

JO - Environment and Urbanization

JF - Environment and Urbanization

SN - 0956-2478

IS - 2

ER -