Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Linguistic Bootstrapping Allows More Real-world...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Linguistic Bootstrapping Allows More Real-world Object Concepts to Be Held in Mind

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Linguistic Bootstrapping Allows More Real-world Object Concepts to Be Held in Mind. / Dymarska, Agata; Connell, Louise; Banks, Briony.
In: Collabra Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 40171, 15.11.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dymarska A, Connell L, Banks B. Linguistic Bootstrapping Allows More Real-world Object Concepts to Be Held in Mind. Collabra Psychology. 2022 Nov 15;8(1):40171. doi: 10.1525/collabra.40171

Author

Bibtex

@article{1eace462f46742e09c589dad2057c1cc,
title = "Linguistic Bootstrapping Allows More Real-world Object Concepts to Be Held in Mind",
abstract = "The linguistic-simulation approach to cognition predicts that language can enable more efficient conceptual processing than purely sensorimotor-affective simulations of concepts. We tested the implications of this approach in memory for sequences of real-world objects, where use of linguistic labels (i.e., words and phrases) could enable more efficient representation of object concepts than representation via full sensorimotor simulation; a proposal called linguistic bootstrapping. In three pre-registered experiments using a nonverbal paradigm, we asked participants to remember sequences of contextually-situated, real-world objects (e.g., the ingredients for a recipe), and later asked them to select the correct objects from arrays of distractors. Critically, we used articulatory suppression to selectively suppress implicit activation of linguistic labels, which we predicted would impair performance by reducing the number of objects that could be held in mind simultaneously. We found that suppressing access to language when learning the sequences impaired accuracy of object recognition, though not latency, and that this impairment was not simply dual-task load. Results show that a sequence of up to 10 contextually-situated object concepts can be held in mind when language is inhibited, but this increases to 12 objects when language is available. The findings support the linguistic bootstrapping hypothesis that representing familiar object concepts normally relies on language, and that implicitly-retrieved object labels, used as linguistic placeholders, can increase the number of objects that can be simultaneously represented beyond what sensorimotor information alone can accomplish.",
keywords = "concepts, sensorimotor simulation, mental representation, linguistic labels, linguistic bootstrapping",
author = "Agata Dymarska and Louise Connell and Briony Banks",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1525/collabra.40171",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Collabra Psychology",
issn = "2474-7394",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linguistic Bootstrapping Allows More Real-world Object Concepts to Be Held in Mind

AU - Dymarska, Agata

AU - Connell, Louise

AU - Banks, Briony

PY - 2022/11/15

Y1 - 2022/11/15

N2 - The linguistic-simulation approach to cognition predicts that language can enable more efficient conceptual processing than purely sensorimotor-affective simulations of concepts. We tested the implications of this approach in memory for sequences of real-world objects, where use of linguistic labels (i.e., words and phrases) could enable more efficient representation of object concepts than representation via full sensorimotor simulation; a proposal called linguistic bootstrapping. In three pre-registered experiments using a nonverbal paradigm, we asked participants to remember sequences of contextually-situated, real-world objects (e.g., the ingredients for a recipe), and later asked them to select the correct objects from arrays of distractors. Critically, we used articulatory suppression to selectively suppress implicit activation of linguistic labels, which we predicted would impair performance by reducing the number of objects that could be held in mind simultaneously. We found that suppressing access to language when learning the sequences impaired accuracy of object recognition, though not latency, and that this impairment was not simply dual-task load. Results show that a sequence of up to 10 contextually-situated object concepts can be held in mind when language is inhibited, but this increases to 12 objects when language is available. The findings support the linguistic bootstrapping hypothesis that representing familiar object concepts normally relies on language, and that implicitly-retrieved object labels, used as linguistic placeholders, can increase the number of objects that can be simultaneously represented beyond what sensorimotor information alone can accomplish.

AB - The linguistic-simulation approach to cognition predicts that language can enable more efficient conceptual processing than purely sensorimotor-affective simulations of concepts. We tested the implications of this approach in memory for sequences of real-world objects, where use of linguistic labels (i.e., words and phrases) could enable more efficient representation of object concepts than representation via full sensorimotor simulation; a proposal called linguistic bootstrapping. In three pre-registered experiments using a nonverbal paradigm, we asked participants to remember sequences of contextually-situated, real-world objects (e.g., the ingredients for a recipe), and later asked them to select the correct objects from arrays of distractors. Critically, we used articulatory suppression to selectively suppress implicit activation of linguistic labels, which we predicted would impair performance by reducing the number of objects that could be held in mind simultaneously. We found that suppressing access to language when learning the sequences impaired accuracy of object recognition, though not latency, and that this impairment was not simply dual-task load. Results show that a sequence of up to 10 contextually-situated object concepts can be held in mind when language is inhibited, but this increases to 12 objects when language is available. The findings support the linguistic bootstrapping hypothesis that representing familiar object concepts normally relies on language, and that implicitly-retrieved object labels, used as linguistic placeholders, can increase the number of objects that can be simultaneously represented beyond what sensorimotor information alone can accomplish.

KW - concepts

KW - sensorimotor simulation

KW - mental representation

KW - linguistic labels

KW - linguistic bootstrapping

U2 - 10.1525/collabra.40171

DO - 10.1525/collabra.40171

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

JO - Collabra Psychology

JF - Collabra Psychology

SN - 2474-7394

IS - 1

M1 - 40171

ER -