Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory. / Hicks, Christina C.; Cinner, Joshua E.; Stoeckl, Natalie et al.
In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 29, No. 5, 10.2015, p. 1471-1480.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hicks, CC, Cinner, JE, Stoeckl, N & McClanahan, TR 2015, 'Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory', Conservation Biology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1471-1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12550

APA

Hicks, C. C., Cinner, J. E., Stoeckl, N., & McClanahan, T. R. (2015). Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory. Conservation Biology, 29(5), 1471-1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12550

Vancouver

Hicks CC, Cinner JE, Stoeckl N, McClanahan TR. Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory. Conservation Biology. 2015 Oct;29(5):1471-1480. Epub 2015 Jun 30. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12550

Author

Hicks, Christina C. ; Cinner, Joshua E. ; Stoeckl, Natalie et al. / Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory. In: Conservation Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 1471-1480.

Bibtex

@article{4eef05c04cb449529c537607318a798a,
title = "Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory",
abstract = "Understanding why people make the decisions they do remains a fundamental challenge facing conservation science. Ecosystem service (ES) (a benefit people derive from an ecosystem) approaches to conservation reflect efforts to anticipate people's preferences and influence their environmental behavior. Yet, the design of ES approaches seldom includes psychological theories of human behavior. We sought to alleviate this omission by applying a psychological theory of human values to a cross-cultural ES assessment. We used interviews and focus groups with fish workers from 28 coral reef fishing communities in 4 countries to qualitatively identify the motivations (i.e., human values) underlying preferences for ES; quantitatively evaluate resource user ES priorities; and identify common patterns among ES motivations and ES priorities (i.e., trade-offs and synergies). Three key findings are evident that align with human values theory. First, motivations underlying preferences for individual ESs reflected multiple human values within the same value domain (e.g., self-enhancement). Second, when averaged at community or country scales, the order of ES priorities was consistent. However, the order belied significant variation that existed among individuals. Third, in line with human values theory, ESs related to one another in a consistent pattern; certain service pairs reflected trade-off relationships (e.g., supporting and provisioning), whereas other service pairs reflected synergistic relationships (e.g., supporting and regulating). Together, these findings help improve understanding of when and why convergence and trade-offs in people's preferences for ESs occur, and this knowledge can inform the development of suitable conservation actions.",
keywords = "cultural psychology, human behavior, motivations, social psychology, synergy, trade-off, LAND-USE, FISHERIES, MANAGEMENT, TRADEOFFS, BEHAVIOR, REEFS",
author = "Hicks, {Christina C.} and Cinner, {Joshua E.} and Natalie Stoeckl and McClanahan, {Tim R.}",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/cobi.12550",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1471--1480",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Blackwell-Wiley",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory

AU - Hicks, Christina C.

AU - Cinner, Joshua E.

AU - Stoeckl, Natalie

AU - McClanahan, Tim R.

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Understanding why people make the decisions they do remains a fundamental challenge facing conservation science. Ecosystem service (ES) (a benefit people derive from an ecosystem) approaches to conservation reflect efforts to anticipate people's preferences and influence their environmental behavior. Yet, the design of ES approaches seldom includes psychological theories of human behavior. We sought to alleviate this omission by applying a psychological theory of human values to a cross-cultural ES assessment. We used interviews and focus groups with fish workers from 28 coral reef fishing communities in 4 countries to qualitatively identify the motivations (i.e., human values) underlying preferences for ES; quantitatively evaluate resource user ES priorities; and identify common patterns among ES motivations and ES priorities (i.e., trade-offs and synergies). Three key findings are evident that align with human values theory. First, motivations underlying preferences for individual ESs reflected multiple human values within the same value domain (e.g., self-enhancement). Second, when averaged at community or country scales, the order of ES priorities was consistent. However, the order belied significant variation that existed among individuals. Third, in line with human values theory, ESs related to one another in a consistent pattern; certain service pairs reflected trade-off relationships (e.g., supporting and provisioning), whereas other service pairs reflected synergistic relationships (e.g., supporting and regulating). Together, these findings help improve understanding of when and why convergence and trade-offs in people's preferences for ESs occur, and this knowledge can inform the development of suitable conservation actions.

AB - Understanding why people make the decisions they do remains a fundamental challenge facing conservation science. Ecosystem service (ES) (a benefit people derive from an ecosystem) approaches to conservation reflect efforts to anticipate people's preferences and influence their environmental behavior. Yet, the design of ES approaches seldom includes psychological theories of human behavior. We sought to alleviate this omission by applying a psychological theory of human values to a cross-cultural ES assessment. We used interviews and focus groups with fish workers from 28 coral reef fishing communities in 4 countries to qualitatively identify the motivations (i.e., human values) underlying preferences for ES; quantitatively evaluate resource user ES priorities; and identify common patterns among ES motivations and ES priorities (i.e., trade-offs and synergies). Three key findings are evident that align with human values theory. First, motivations underlying preferences for individual ESs reflected multiple human values within the same value domain (e.g., self-enhancement). Second, when averaged at community or country scales, the order of ES priorities was consistent. However, the order belied significant variation that existed among individuals. Third, in line with human values theory, ESs related to one another in a consistent pattern; certain service pairs reflected trade-off relationships (e.g., supporting and provisioning), whereas other service pairs reflected synergistic relationships (e.g., supporting and regulating). Together, these findings help improve understanding of when and why convergence and trade-offs in people's preferences for ESs occur, and this knowledge can inform the development of suitable conservation actions.

KW - cultural psychology

KW - human behavior

KW - motivations

KW - social psychology

KW - synergy

KW - trade-off

KW - LAND-USE

KW - FISHERIES

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - TRADEOFFS

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - REEFS

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.12550

DO - 10.1111/cobi.12550

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 1471

EP - 1480

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 5

ER -