Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Locating impropriety
View graph of relations

Locating impropriety: street drinking, moral order and the ideological dilemma of public space.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Locating impropriety: street drinking, moral order and the ideological dilemma of public space. / Dixon, John A.; Levine, Mark; McAuley, Rob.
In: Political Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 30.04.2006, p. 187-206.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dixon JA, Levine M, McAuley R. Locating impropriety: street drinking, moral order and the ideological dilemma of public space. Political Psychology. 2006 Apr 30;27(2):187-206. Epub 2006 Mar 23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00002.x

Author

Bibtex

@article{18762d7d946f434e8cf456e55003b70c,
title = "Locating impropriety: street drinking, moral order and the ideological dilemma of public space.",
abstract = "Drawing on research in urban sociology, cultural geography, and social psychology, this paper explores some of the moral rules that govern social relations in public places. In particular, we consider how certain practices become classified as everyday incivilities—infractions of the moral order that sustains public life. In order to develop this notion, we draw illustrations from an ongoing research project that is investigating social attitudes towards {"}street drinking,{"} an activity that has led to the creation of {"}alcohol-free zones{"} in over 100 British cities during the past decade. As an emergent theme, this research has suggested that the classification of street drinking as either acceptable or unacceptable conduct is contingent upon the social construction of public space that users invoke. This theme is discussed in the context of wider struggles over citizenship and social control in the public domain—struggles manifest within {"}ideological dilemmas{"} (Billig et al., 1988) over the limits of free conduct, the tension between open and closed public spaces, and the attempt to distinguish {"}admissible{"} from {"}inadmissible{"} publics.",
author = "Dixon, {John A.} and Mark Levine and Rob McAuley",
year = "2006",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00002.x",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "187--206",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "1467-9221",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locating impropriety

T2 - street drinking, moral order and the ideological dilemma of public space.

AU - Dixon, John A.

AU - Levine, Mark

AU - McAuley, Rob

PY - 2006/4/30

Y1 - 2006/4/30

N2 - Drawing on research in urban sociology, cultural geography, and social psychology, this paper explores some of the moral rules that govern social relations in public places. In particular, we consider how certain practices become classified as everyday incivilities—infractions of the moral order that sustains public life. In order to develop this notion, we draw illustrations from an ongoing research project that is investigating social attitudes towards "street drinking," an activity that has led to the creation of "alcohol-free zones" in over 100 British cities during the past decade. As an emergent theme, this research has suggested that the classification of street drinking as either acceptable or unacceptable conduct is contingent upon the social construction of public space that users invoke. This theme is discussed in the context of wider struggles over citizenship and social control in the public domain—struggles manifest within "ideological dilemmas" (Billig et al., 1988) over the limits of free conduct, the tension between open and closed public spaces, and the attempt to distinguish "admissible" from "inadmissible" publics.

AB - Drawing on research in urban sociology, cultural geography, and social psychology, this paper explores some of the moral rules that govern social relations in public places. In particular, we consider how certain practices become classified as everyday incivilities—infractions of the moral order that sustains public life. In order to develop this notion, we draw illustrations from an ongoing research project that is investigating social attitudes towards "street drinking," an activity that has led to the creation of "alcohol-free zones" in over 100 British cities during the past decade. As an emergent theme, this research has suggested that the classification of street drinking as either acceptable or unacceptable conduct is contingent upon the social construction of public space that users invoke. This theme is discussed in the context of wider struggles over citizenship and social control in the public domain—struggles manifest within "ideological dilemmas" (Billig et al., 1988) over the limits of free conduct, the tension between open and closed public spaces, and the attempt to distinguish "admissible" from "inadmissible" publics.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00002.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00002.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 187

EP - 206

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 1467-9221

IS - 2

ER -