Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Loneliness, social support, social isolation an...

Electronic data

  • Disability_Loneliness_Wellbeing_REVISED_CLEAN

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Disability and Health Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Disability and Health Journal, 14, 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.1 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross sectional study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross sectional study. / Emerson, E.; Fortune, N.; Llewellyn, G. et al.
In: Disability and Health Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 100965, 01.01.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Emerson E, Fortune N, Llewellyn G, Stancliffe R. Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross sectional study. Disability and Health Journal. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):100965. Epub 2020 Aug 5. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965

Author

Emerson, E. ; Fortune, N. ; Llewellyn, G. et al. / Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability : Cross sectional study. In: Disability and Health Journal. 2021 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{29fc36cb3e054d9fbfbd4cec689c09ce,
title = "Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross sectional study",
abstract = "Background: Loneliness is significantly related to health and wellbeing. However, there is little information on the prevalence of loneliness among people with disability or the association between disability, loneliness and wellbeing. Objective/hypothesis: For a nationally representative sample of adults (age 16–64) with/without disability, to examine exposure to three indicators of low social connectedness (loneliness, low perceived social support, social isolation), and to evaluate the association between low social connectedness and wellbeing. To test whether disability status moderated the relationship between low social connectedness and wellbeing. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from three annual rounds of the cross-sectional English Community Life Survey (CLS) 2016–19. Results: People with disability experienced loneliness, low perceived social support and social isolation at significantly higher rates than people without disability. Effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. Disability was associated with lower wellbeing. With one exception, low social connectedness was associated with lower wellbeing. Again, effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. The prevalence of loneliness was highest among adults with disability who were younger, economically inactive, living in rented or other accommodation, living alone and with low levels of access to environmental assets. There was no evidence that disability status moderated the association between exposure to low social connectedness and low wellbeing. Conclusions: Loneliness was a particularly significant driver of poor wellbeing among people with disability. The relative independence between different indicators of social connectedness suggests that interventions to reduce loneliness will need to do more than simply increase rates of social contact or social support. {\textcopyright} 2020 Elsevier Inc.",
keywords = "Adults, Disability, Loneliness, Social isolation, Social support, Wellbeing",
author = "E. Emerson and N. Fortune and G. Llewellyn and R. Stancliffe",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Disability and Health Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Disability and Health Journal, 14, 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Disability and Health Journal",
issn = "1936-6574",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability

T2 - Cross sectional study

AU - Emerson, E.

AU - Fortune, N.

AU - Llewellyn, G.

AU - Stancliffe, R.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Disability and Health Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Disability and Health Journal, 14, 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - Background: Loneliness is significantly related to health and wellbeing. However, there is little information on the prevalence of loneliness among people with disability or the association between disability, loneliness and wellbeing. Objective/hypothesis: For a nationally representative sample of adults (age 16–64) with/without disability, to examine exposure to three indicators of low social connectedness (loneliness, low perceived social support, social isolation), and to evaluate the association between low social connectedness and wellbeing. To test whether disability status moderated the relationship between low social connectedness and wellbeing. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from three annual rounds of the cross-sectional English Community Life Survey (CLS) 2016–19. Results: People with disability experienced loneliness, low perceived social support and social isolation at significantly higher rates than people without disability. Effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. Disability was associated with lower wellbeing. With one exception, low social connectedness was associated with lower wellbeing. Again, effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. The prevalence of loneliness was highest among adults with disability who were younger, economically inactive, living in rented or other accommodation, living alone and with low levels of access to environmental assets. There was no evidence that disability status moderated the association between exposure to low social connectedness and low wellbeing. Conclusions: Loneliness was a particularly significant driver of poor wellbeing among people with disability. The relative independence between different indicators of social connectedness suggests that interventions to reduce loneliness will need to do more than simply increase rates of social contact or social support. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.

AB - Background: Loneliness is significantly related to health and wellbeing. However, there is little information on the prevalence of loneliness among people with disability or the association between disability, loneliness and wellbeing. Objective/hypothesis: For a nationally representative sample of adults (age 16–64) with/without disability, to examine exposure to three indicators of low social connectedness (loneliness, low perceived social support, social isolation), and to evaluate the association between low social connectedness and wellbeing. To test whether disability status moderated the relationship between low social connectedness and wellbeing. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from three annual rounds of the cross-sectional English Community Life Survey (CLS) 2016–19. Results: People with disability experienced loneliness, low perceived social support and social isolation at significantly higher rates than people without disability. Effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. Disability was associated with lower wellbeing. With one exception, low social connectedness was associated with lower wellbeing. Again, effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. The prevalence of loneliness was highest among adults with disability who were younger, economically inactive, living in rented or other accommodation, living alone and with low levels of access to environmental assets. There was no evidence that disability status moderated the association between exposure to low social connectedness and low wellbeing. Conclusions: Loneliness was a particularly significant driver of poor wellbeing among people with disability. The relative independence between different indicators of social connectedness suggests that interventions to reduce loneliness will need to do more than simply increase rates of social contact or social support. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.

KW - Adults

KW - Disability

KW - Loneliness

KW - Social isolation

KW - Social support

KW - Wellbeing

U2 - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965

DO - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

JO - Disability and Health Journal

JF - Disability and Health Journal

SN - 1936-6574

IS - 1

M1 - 100965

ER -