Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Looking at ourselves

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Looking at ourselves: an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Looking at ourselves: an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories . / Harper, Richard H.R.
CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. New York: ACM, 1992. p. 330-337.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Harper, RHR 1992, Looking at ourselves: an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories . in CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp. 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143542

APA

Harper, R. H. R. (1992). Looking at ourselves: an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories . In CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 330-337). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143542

Vancouver

Harper RHR. Looking at ourselves: an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories . In CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. New York: ACM. 1992. p. 330-337 doi: 10.1145/143457.143542

Author

Harper, Richard H.R. / Looking at ourselves : an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories . CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. New York : ACM, 1992. pp. 330-337

Bibtex

@inproceedings{18362a11c22f43c2b86c714e8083ffca,
title = "Looking at ourselves: an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories ",
abstract = "This paper reports findings from ongoing examinations into the social organization of research laboratories. Two case studies are discussed, and it is suggested that although there are differences between the two sites, commonalities are shown in their hierarchical nature and in the status of researchers. It is argued that researchers form a professional group with all that entails in terms of rights and privileges. More generally it is argued that the social organization of research laboratories is resistant to change. The consequences of this on the testing and development of systems that have the potential to transform hierarchical relations is briefly discussed and how this resistance and its causes differentiate research laboratories from other work places remarked.",
keywords = "Hierarchical systems, Professional aspects, Social aspects, Societies and institutions, Systems analysis, Active badges, Ethnography, Research laboratories",
author = "Harper, {Richard H.R.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1145/143457.143542",
language = "English",
isbn = "0897915429",
pages = "330--337",
booktitle = "CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work",
publisher = "ACM",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Looking at ourselves

T2 - an examination of the social organization of two research laboratories

AU - Harper, Richard H.R.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - This paper reports findings from ongoing examinations into the social organization of research laboratories. Two case studies are discussed, and it is suggested that although there are differences between the two sites, commonalities are shown in their hierarchical nature and in the status of researchers. It is argued that researchers form a professional group with all that entails in terms of rights and privileges. More generally it is argued that the social organization of research laboratories is resistant to change. The consequences of this on the testing and development of systems that have the potential to transform hierarchical relations is briefly discussed and how this resistance and its causes differentiate research laboratories from other work places remarked.

AB - This paper reports findings from ongoing examinations into the social organization of research laboratories. Two case studies are discussed, and it is suggested that although there are differences between the two sites, commonalities are shown in their hierarchical nature and in the status of researchers. It is argued that researchers form a professional group with all that entails in terms of rights and privileges. More generally it is argued that the social organization of research laboratories is resistant to change. The consequences of this on the testing and development of systems that have the potential to transform hierarchical relations is briefly discussed and how this resistance and its causes differentiate research laboratories from other work places remarked.

KW - Hierarchical systems

KW - Professional aspects

KW - Social aspects

KW - Societies and institutions

KW - Systems analysis

KW - Active badges

KW - Ethnography

KW - Research laboratories

U2 - 10.1145/143457.143542

DO - 10.1145/143457.143542

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 0897915429

SP - 330

EP - 337

BT - CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work

PB - ACM

CY - New York

ER -