Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequal...

Electronic data

  • Risk class TCS - Accepted - PURE

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture & Society 37 (2), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Culture & Society page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/TCS on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 562 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequalities?: Risk-Class, the Chinese Middle Class and the Moral Economy of Misrecognition

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequalities? Risk-Class, the Chinese Middle Class and the Moral Economy of Misrecognition. / Dean, Curran; Tyfield, David.
In: Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.03.2020, p. 131-156.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dean C, Tyfield D. Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequalities? Risk-Class, the Chinese Middle Class and the Moral Economy of Misrecognition. Theory, Culture and Society. 2020 Mar 1;37(2):131-156. Epub 2019 Sept 5. doi: 10.1177/0263276419869438

Author

Bibtex

@article{8ca36928b8464bb5bba254c114bb4a93,
title = "Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequalities?: Risk-Class, the Chinese Middle Class and the Moral Economy of Misrecognition",
abstract = "Low-carbon innovation is usually depicted as an exemplar of pursuit of the common good, in both mainstream policy discussion and the emerging orthodoxy of transition studies. Yet it may emerge as a key means of intensifying inequality. We analyse low-carbon innovation as a social and political process through the prism of differential risk-classes, focusing on the pivotal global case of emergence of the Chinese middle-class in seaboard megacities, especially regarding the profound challenges of urban e-mobility transition. This approach shows emergence of this still-forming sociopolitical grouping as tightly and complementarily coupled with the assembling of innovations that meaningfully tackle global risks, such as climate change, while also intensifying existing inequalities. Misrecognition of the duality of low-carbon innovations as both moral technologies and as relatively expensive consumer products has the potentiality to be a key mechanism of this process, thereby serving to reproduce, constitute and legitimize inequalities in novel and unexpected ways.",
keywords = "Risk-class, Chinese Middle-Class, Low-carbon innovation, Electric urban mobility, Misrecognition",
author = "Curran Dean and David Tyfield",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture & Society 37 (2), 2019, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Culture & Society page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/TCS on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/ ",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0263276419869438",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "131--156",
journal = "Theory, Culture and Society",
issn = "0263-2764",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequalities?

T2 - Risk-Class, the Chinese Middle Class and the Moral Economy of Misrecognition

AU - Dean, Curran

AU - Tyfield, David

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture & Society 37 (2), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Culture & Society page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/TCS on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2020/3/1

Y1 - 2020/3/1

N2 - Low-carbon innovation is usually depicted as an exemplar of pursuit of the common good, in both mainstream policy discussion and the emerging orthodoxy of transition studies. Yet it may emerge as a key means of intensifying inequality. We analyse low-carbon innovation as a social and political process through the prism of differential risk-classes, focusing on the pivotal global case of emergence of the Chinese middle-class in seaboard megacities, especially regarding the profound challenges of urban e-mobility transition. This approach shows emergence of this still-forming sociopolitical grouping as tightly and complementarily coupled with the assembling of innovations that meaningfully tackle global risks, such as climate change, while also intensifying existing inequalities. Misrecognition of the duality of low-carbon innovations as both moral technologies and as relatively expensive consumer products has the potentiality to be a key mechanism of this process, thereby serving to reproduce, constitute and legitimize inequalities in novel and unexpected ways.

AB - Low-carbon innovation is usually depicted as an exemplar of pursuit of the common good, in both mainstream policy discussion and the emerging orthodoxy of transition studies. Yet it may emerge as a key means of intensifying inequality. We analyse low-carbon innovation as a social and political process through the prism of differential risk-classes, focusing on the pivotal global case of emergence of the Chinese middle-class in seaboard megacities, especially regarding the profound challenges of urban e-mobility transition. This approach shows emergence of this still-forming sociopolitical grouping as tightly and complementarily coupled with the assembling of innovations that meaningfully tackle global risks, such as climate change, while also intensifying existing inequalities. Misrecognition of the duality of low-carbon innovations as both moral technologies and as relatively expensive consumer products has the potentiality to be a key mechanism of this process, thereby serving to reproduce, constitute and legitimize inequalities in novel and unexpected ways.

KW - Risk-class

KW - Chinese Middle-Class

KW - Low-carbon innovation

KW - Electric urban mobility

KW - Misrecognition

U2 - 10.1177/0263276419869438

DO - 10.1177/0263276419869438

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 131

EP - 156

JO - Theory, Culture and Society

JF - Theory, Culture and Society

SN - 0263-2764

IS - 2

ER -