Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture & Society 37 (2), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Culture & Society page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/TCS on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 562 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-Carbon Transition as Vehicle of New Inequalities?
T2 - Risk-Class, the Chinese Middle Class and the Moral Economy of Misrecognition
AU - Dean, Curran
AU - Tyfield, David
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture & Society 37 (2), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Culture & Society page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/TCS on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Low-carbon innovation is usually depicted as an exemplar of pursuit of the common good, in both mainstream policy discussion and the emerging orthodoxy of transition studies. Yet it may emerge as a key means of intensifying inequality. We analyse low-carbon innovation as a social and political process through the prism of differential risk-classes, focusing on the pivotal global case of emergence of the Chinese middle-class in seaboard megacities, especially regarding the profound challenges of urban e-mobility transition. This approach shows emergence of this still-forming sociopolitical grouping as tightly and complementarily coupled with the assembling of innovations that meaningfully tackle global risks, such as climate change, while also intensifying existing inequalities. Misrecognition of the duality of low-carbon innovations as both moral technologies and as relatively expensive consumer products has the potentiality to be a key mechanism of this process, thereby serving to reproduce, constitute and legitimize inequalities in novel and unexpected ways.
AB - Low-carbon innovation is usually depicted as an exemplar of pursuit of the common good, in both mainstream policy discussion and the emerging orthodoxy of transition studies. Yet it may emerge as a key means of intensifying inequality. We analyse low-carbon innovation as a social and political process through the prism of differential risk-classes, focusing on the pivotal global case of emergence of the Chinese middle-class in seaboard megacities, especially regarding the profound challenges of urban e-mobility transition. This approach shows emergence of this still-forming sociopolitical grouping as tightly and complementarily coupled with the assembling of innovations that meaningfully tackle global risks, such as climate change, while also intensifying existing inequalities. Misrecognition of the duality of low-carbon innovations as both moral technologies and as relatively expensive consumer products has the potentiality to be a key mechanism of this process, thereby serving to reproduce, constitute and legitimize inequalities in novel and unexpected ways.
KW - Risk-class
KW - Chinese Middle-Class
KW - Low-carbon innovation
KW - Electric urban mobility
KW - Misrecognition
U2 - 10.1177/0263276419869438
DO - 10.1177/0263276419869438
M3 - Journal article
VL - 37
SP - 131
EP - 156
JO - Theory, Culture and Society
JF - Theory, Culture and Society
SN - 0263-2764
IS - 2
ER -