Accepted author manuscript, 439 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: Unspecified
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lucila Quieto’s Filiación and the End[s] of Post-Dictatorship Art-Photography
AU - Rojinsky, David
PY - 2017/5/24
Y1 - 2017/5/24
N2 - Post-dictatorship Argentinian art-photography is often regarded as exemplifying a contemporary rejection of the photograph as infallible index of past presence. Instead, commentators tend to view artists’ photo-essays primarily as post-photographic ‘testimonies’ to the compensatory or fictional aspects of an incomplete or even invented memory of the authoritarian past. While acknowledging this appeal to the poetic capacity of photography, this essay nevertheless proposes that for artists and viewers alike, the credibility of the photograph as index has not simply been discarded. Indeed, a nostalgia for an archival image which can be conflated with a material trace of past experience or even with the referent itself, has continued to inform both the production and reception of such art photography. By extension, this appeal to a residual materiality in photo-essays largely devoted to the affective realm of family grief for disappeared relatives, actually allows the photo-artists to transcend the limits of a depoliticized family frame and to re-affirm the traditional link between history and photography. Consequently, Lucila Quieto’s Filiación (2013), an emblematic instance of this premise, serves, both aesthetically and thematically, to divert the viewer away from empathetic familial identification towards a reading of the exhibition as an allegory of the political violence exercised in a specific historical context.
AB - Post-dictatorship Argentinian art-photography is often regarded as exemplifying a contemporary rejection of the photograph as infallible index of past presence. Instead, commentators tend to view artists’ photo-essays primarily as post-photographic ‘testimonies’ to the compensatory or fictional aspects of an incomplete or even invented memory of the authoritarian past. While acknowledging this appeal to the poetic capacity of photography, this essay nevertheless proposes that for artists and viewers alike, the credibility of the photograph as index has not simply been discarded. Indeed, a nostalgia for an archival image which can be conflated with a material trace of past experience or even with the referent itself, has continued to inform both the production and reception of such art photography. By extension, this appeal to a residual materiality in photo-essays largely devoted to the affective realm of family grief for disappeared relatives, actually allows the photo-artists to transcend the limits of a depoliticized family frame and to re-affirm the traditional link between history and photography. Consequently, Lucila Quieto’s Filiación (2013), an emblematic instance of this premise, serves, both aesthetically and thematically, to divert the viewer away from empathetic familial identification towards a reading of the exhibition as an allegory of the political violence exercised in a specific historical context.
KW - photographic index
KW - mourning
KW - Argentina
KW - memory art
KW - the disappeared
KW - history
KW - politics of spectatorship
KW - Lucila Quieto
KW - Latin American Cultural Studies
KW - Post-Dictatorship
KW - State Terror
KW - Politics
M3 - Journal article
VL - 14
SP - 171
EP - 199
JO - A Contracorriente
JF - A Contracorriente
SN - 1548-7083
IS - 3
ER -