Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - M & A and innovation
T2 - The role of integration and cultural differences — A central European targets perspective
AU - Bauer, Florian
AU - Matzler, Kurt
AU - Wolf, Stefan
PY - 2016/2
Y1 - 2016/2
N2 - Cultural differences are an important issue for cross-border M&A. Empirical evidence for the impact of cultural differences on M&A performance is mixed. A major reason for these inconclusive results relies on integration. One main motive for cross-border transactions is the acquisition of innovative capabilities. In a study of innovation-driven M&A in the German-speaking part of Europe, we find different effects of human and task integration on the innovation outcome after the transaction. While human integration (i.e., the creation of a shared identity and satisfaction among the employees from both organizations) is rather destructive, task integration (i.e., the transfer and sharing of resources and capabilities) is beneficial for innovation output. Furthermore, the integration-innovation performance relationship is moderated by national cultural differences. While national cultural differences have a downward curvilinear slope moderating the effect of human integration to innovation, we find a clear inverted U-shaped slope moderating the effect for task integration. Both effects indicate that cultural similarity is more beneficial in the case of innovation-driven M&A with targets in Central Europe.
AB - Cultural differences are an important issue for cross-border M&A. Empirical evidence for the impact of cultural differences on M&A performance is mixed. A major reason for these inconclusive results relies on integration. One main motive for cross-border transactions is the acquisition of innovative capabilities. In a study of innovation-driven M&A in the German-speaking part of Europe, we find different effects of human and task integration on the innovation outcome after the transaction. While human integration (i.e., the creation of a shared identity and satisfaction among the employees from both organizations) is rather destructive, task integration (i.e., the transfer and sharing of resources and capabilities) is beneficial for innovation output. Furthermore, the integration-innovation performance relationship is moderated by national cultural differences. While national cultural differences have a downward curvilinear slope moderating the effect of human integration to innovation, we find a clear inverted U-shaped slope moderating the effect for task integration. Both effects indicate that cultural similarity is more beneficial in the case of innovation-driven M&A with targets in Central Europe.
KW - Innovation
KW - M&A
KW - National culture
KW - Targets perspective
U2 - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.010
M3 - Journal article
VL - 25
SP - 76
EP - 86
JO - International Business Review
JF - International Business Review
SN - 0969-5931
IS - 1 Part A
ER -