Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Madness, virtue, and ecology
T2 - A classical Indian approach to psychiatric disturbance
AU - Ram-Prasad, Chakravarthi
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - The Caraka Sam. hita¯ (ca. first century BCE–third century CE), the first classical Indian medical compendium, covers a wide variety of pharmacological and therapeutic treatment, while also sketching out a philosophical anthropology of the human subject who is the patient of the physicians for whom this text was composed. In this article, I outline some of the relevant aspects of this anthropology – in particular, its understanding of ‘mind’ and other elements that constitute the subject – before exploring two ways in which it approaches ‘psychiatric’ disorder: one as ‘mental illness’ (manasa-roga ¯ ), the other as ‘madness’ (unmada ¯ ). I focus on two aspects of this approach. One concerns themoral relationship between the virtuous and the well life, or the moral and the medical dimensions of a patient’s subjectivity. The other is about the phenomenological relationship between the patient and the ecology within which the patient’s disturbance occurs. The aetiology of and responses to such disturbances helps us think more carefully about the very contours of subjectivity, about who we are and how we should understand ourselves. I locate this interpretation within a larger programme on the interpretation of the whole human being, which I have elsewhere called ‘ecological phenomenology’.
AB - The Caraka Sam. hita¯ (ca. first century BCE–third century CE), the first classical Indian medical compendium, covers a wide variety of pharmacological and therapeutic treatment, while also sketching out a philosophical anthropology of the human subject who is the patient of the physicians for whom this text was composed. In this article, I outline some of the relevant aspects of this anthropology – in particular, its understanding of ‘mind’ and other elements that constitute the subject – before exploring two ways in which it approaches ‘psychiatric’ disorder: one as ‘mental illness’ (manasa-roga ¯ ), the other as ‘madness’ (unmada ¯ ). I focus on two aspects of this approach. One concerns themoral relationship between the virtuous and the well life, or the moral and the medical dimensions of a patient’s subjectivity. The other is about the phenomenological relationship between the patient and the ecology within which the patient’s disturbance occurs. The aetiology of and responses to such disturbances helps us think more carefully about the very contours of subjectivity, about who we are and how we should understand ourselves. I locate this interpretation within a larger programme on the interpretation of the whole human being, which I have elsewhere called ‘ecological phenomenology’.
KW - Caraka Saṃhitā
KW - Indian philosophy
KW - madness
KW - phenomenology
KW - psychiatry
U2 - 10.1177/0952695120982242
DO - 10.1177/0952695120982242
M3 - Journal article
VL - 35
SP - 3
EP - 31
JO - History of the Human Sciences
JF - History of the Human Sciences
SN - 0952-6951
IS - 1
ER -