Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments de...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques. / Jordanova, Neli; Jordanova, Diana; Karloukovski, Vassil.
In: Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, Vol. 40, No. 1, 31.01.1996, p. 36-49.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Jordanova, N, Jordanova, D & Karloukovski, V 1996, 'Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques', Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295904

APA

Jordanova, N., Jordanova, D., & Karloukovski, V. (1996). Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 40(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295904

Vancouver

Jordanova N, Jordanova D, Karloukovski V. Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. 1996 Jan 31;40(1):36-49. doi: 10.1007/BF02295904

Author

Jordanova, Neli ; Jordanova, Diana ; Karloukovski, Vassil. / Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques. In: Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. 1996 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 36-49.

Bibtex

@article{a6111b46b1c6400e8a1ca0e40dbad305,
title = "Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques",
abstract = "The anisotropy of low field magnetic susceptibility has been studied for seven outcrops of loess sediments in North-Eastern Bulgaria. Different sampling methods were applied in order to choose the best technique for obtaining the primary magnetic fabric of such unconsolidated sediments. AMS results show significant changes in the petrofabric of samples collected by the first technique which disturbs the original sedimentary fabric. The second applied technique does not cause such a strong deformation but some disturbance of the magnetic fabric is probable. Typical sedimentary fabric is obtained from hand samples and it is therefore concluded that this represents the best method for obtaining reliable AMS results from soft sediments.",
keywords = "Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, Compaction, Soft sediments",
author = "Neli Jordanova and Diana Jordanova and Vassil Karloukovski",
year = "1996",
month = jan,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/BF02295904",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "36--49",
journal = "Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica",
issn = "0039-3169",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic fabric of Bulgarian loess sediments derived by using various sampling techniques

AU - Jordanova, Neli

AU - Jordanova, Diana

AU - Karloukovski, Vassil

PY - 1996/1/31

Y1 - 1996/1/31

N2 - The anisotropy of low field magnetic susceptibility has been studied for seven outcrops of loess sediments in North-Eastern Bulgaria. Different sampling methods were applied in order to choose the best technique for obtaining the primary magnetic fabric of such unconsolidated sediments. AMS results show significant changes in the petrofabric of samples collected by the first technique which disturbs the original sedimentary fabric. The second applied technique does not cause such a strong deformation but some disturbance of the magnetic fabric is probable. Typical sedimentary fabric is obtained from hand samples and it is therefore concluded that this represents the best method for obtaining reliable AMS results from soft sediments.

AB - The anisotropy of low field magnetic susceptibility has been studied for seven outcrops of loess sediments in North-Eastern Bulgaria. Different sampling methods were applied in order to choose the best technique for obtaining the primary magnetic fabric of such unconsolidated sediments. AMS results show significant changes in the petrofabric of samples collected by the first technique which disturbs the original sedimentary fabric. The second applied technique does not cause such a strong deformation but some disturbance of the magnetic fabric is probable. Typical sedimentary fabric is obtained from hand samples and it is therefore concluded that this represents the best method for obtaining reliable AMS results from soft sediments.

KW - Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility

KW - Compaction

KW - Soft sediments

U2 - 10.1007/BF02295904

DO - 10.1007/BF02295904

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0029749823

VL - 40

SP - 36

EP - 49

JO - Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

JF - Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

SN - 0039-3169

IS - 1

ER -