Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Making sense of domestic wildlife and CITES leg...

Electronic data

  • Bashyal_et_al_2023_authorcopy_Making_sense_of_domestic_wildlife_and_CITES_legislation

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, 280, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109951

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.21 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Making sense of domestic wildlife and CITES legislation: The example of Nepal's orchids

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
Article number109951
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/04/2023
<mark>Journal</mark>Biological Conservation
Volume280
Number of pages11
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date26/02/23
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Governing wildlife resources is a global challenge, with illegal domestic and international trade emerging as a leading threat to biodiversity. This has prompted a range of international conservation commitments and domestic legislation, including protected species lists and legislation associated with the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Despite their importance, heavy focus on national-level legislation potentially belies the complex networks of sub-national legislation that often inform on-the-ground wildlife management decisions. We highlight the need for a detailed understanding of sub-national legislation in order to meaningfully understand legal and illegal wildlife trade. We demonstrate this using the example of orchids – representing >70 % of all CITES-listed species – and focus on Nepal, a wildlife trade hotspot. We describe the available evidence on the country's overlapping legal and illegal orchid trade and provide a structured analysis of 55 pieces of domestic legislation that govern the country's orchid resources. It is likely that other countries and taxa face similar levels of complexity, and we propose an approach for more thorough and systematic evaluations of sub-national legislation – across areas of law, hierarchical levels of governance, and types of legislation.  

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, 280, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109951