Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Making Sense of Modernity's Maladies
View graph of relations

Making Sense of Modernity's Maladies: Health and Disease in the Industrial Revolution

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Making Sense of Modernity's Maladies: Health and Disease in the Industrial Revolution. / Brown, Michael.
In: Endeavour, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 108-112.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brown M. Making Sense of Modernity's Maladies: Health and Disease in the Industrial Revolution. Endeavour. 2006 Sept 1;30(3):108-112. Epub 2006 Aug 21. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.08.001

Author

Bibtex

@article{5d56c7b2763c45ee94a2410f7006e39c,
title = "Making Sense of Modernity's Maladies: Health and Disease in the Industrial Revolution",
abstract = "The industrialization and urbanization of Britain during the 19th century gave the medical profession something to think about. In particular, were the radical changes taking place in society responsible for the sudden rise in endemic and epidemic disease? This article (part of the Science in the Industrial Revolution series) examines the reactions of two key figures in the history of British public health, James Philips Kay and Thomas Southwood Smith, to this question. Their outlooks typify the tendency of Victorian medical practitioners to construct economies of health that saw disease as a consequence of the violation of natural laws and cycles rather than as a product of industrial modernity.",
author = "Michael Brown",
year = "2006",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "108--112",
journal = "Endeavour",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Sense of Modernity's Maladies

T2 - Health and Disease in the Industrial Revolution

AU - Brown, Michael

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - The industrialization and urbanization of Britain during the 19th century gave the medical profession something to think about. In particular, were the radical changes taking place in society responsible for the sudden rise in endemic and epidemic disease? This article (part of the Science in the Industrial Revolution series) examines the reactions of two key figures in the history of British public health, James Philips Kay and Thomas Southwood Smith, to this question. Their outlooks typify the tendency of Victorian medical practitioners to construct economies of health that saw disease as a consequence of the violation of natural laws and cycles rather than as a product of industrial modernity.

AB - The industrialization and urbanization of Britain during the 19th century gave the medical profession something to think about. In particular, were the radical changes taking place in society responsible for the sudden rise in endemic and epidemic disease? This article (part of the Science in the Industrial Revolution series) examines the reactions of two key figures in the history of British public health, James Philips Kay and Thomas Southwood Smith, to this question. Their outlooks typify the tendency of Victorian medical practitioners to construct economies of health that saw disease as a consequence of the violation of natural laws and cycles rather than as a product of industrial modernity.

U2 - 10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.08.001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 108

EP - 112

JO - Endeavour

JF - Endeavour

IS - 3

ER -