Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Making sense of symptoms

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Making sense of symptoms: Self-categorization and the meaning of illness and injury

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Making sense of symptoms: Self-categorization and the meaning of illness and injury. / Levine, R. M.; Reicher, S. D.
In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 2, 06.1996, p. 245-256.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Levine RM, Reicher SD. Making sense of symptoms: Self-categorization and the meaning of illness and injury. British Journal of Social Psychology. 1996 Jun;35(2):245-256. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01095.x

Author

Levine, R. M. ; Reicher, S. D. / Making sense of symptoms : Self-categorization and the meaning of illness and injury. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. 1996 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 245-256.

Bibtex

@article{f5e568bea9c24870b0b1a04e2fc7a489,
title = "Making sense of symptoms: Self-categorization and the meaning of illness and injury",
abstract = "A central theme in both medical sociology and health psychology is how people make sense of their symptoms. Both literatures, despite their stress on different aspects of the health evaluation process, see illness in terms of matching present symptoms to an underlying understanding of illness. In this paper we argue that such accounts have difficulty in explaining the impact of contextual factors on how symptoms are evaluated. We therefore propose a model based on self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher & Wetherell, 1987). It is proposed that symptoms are evaluated, not against pre-existing illness representations, but by reference to their impact on situationally salient identities. In support of this an experiment is described which involves students who are training to be physical education (PE) teachers. They are defined either in terms of a 'PE student' identity or in terms of a 'gender' identity and asked to evaluate a number of scenarios which describe different illnesses and injuries. Overall, the results provide clear evidence that the significance ascribed to scenarios depends on which identity is salient and hence indicate the viability of a self-categorization theory approach to symptom evaluation.",
author = "Levine, {R. M.} and Reicher, {S. D.}",
year = "1996",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01095.x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "245--256",
journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0144-6665",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of symptoms

T2 - Self-categorization and the meaning of illness and injury

AU - Levine, R. M.

AU - Reicher, S. D.

PY - 1996/6

Y1 - 1996/6

N2 - A central theme in both medical sociology and health psychology is how people make sense of their symptoms. Both literatures, despite their stress on different aspects of the health evaluation process, see illness in terms of matching present symptoms to an underlying understanding of illness. In this paper we argue that such accounts have difficulty in explaining the impact of contextual factors on how symptoms are evaluated. We therefore propose a model based on self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher & Wetherell, 1987). It is proposed that symptoms are evaluated, not against pre-existing illness representations, but by reference to their impact on situationally salient identities. In support of this an experiment is described which involves students who are training to be physical education (PE) teachers. They are defined either in terms of a 'PE student' identity or in terms of a 'gender' identity and asked to evaluate a number of scenarios which describe different illnesses and injuries. Overall, the results provide clear evidence that the significance ascribed to scenarios depends on which identity is salient and hence indicate the viability of a self-categorization theory approach to symptom evaluation.

AB - A central theme in both medical sociology and health psychology is how people make sense of their symptoms. Both literatures, despite their stress on different aspects of the health evaluation process, see illness in terms of matching present symptoms to an underlying understanding of illness. In this paper we argue that such accounts have difficulty in explaining the impact of contextual factors on how symptoms are evaluated. We therefore propose a model based on self-categorization theory (Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher & Wetherell, 1987). It is proposed that symptoms are evaluated, not against pre-existing illness representations, but by reference to their impact on situationally salient identities. In support of this an experiment is described which involves students who are training to be physical education (PE) teachers. They are defined either in terms of a 'PE student' identity or in terms of a 'gender' identity and asked to evaluate a number of scenarios which describe different illnesses and injuries. Overall, the results provide clear evidence that the significance ascribed to scenarios depends on which identity is salient and hence indicate the viability of a self-categorization theory approach to symptom evaluation.

U2 - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01095.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01095.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 8689097

AN - SCOPUS:1542638703

VL - 35

SP - 245

EP - 256

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0144-6665

IS - 2

ER -