Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired?

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired?: contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired? contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition. / Kliesch, Christian.
In: Journal of European Psychology Students, 06.05.2012, p. 88-94.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Kliesch, C 2012, 'Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired? contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition', Journal of European Psychology Students, pp. 88-94. https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.au

APA

Kliesch, C. (2012). Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired? contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition. Journal of European Psychology Students, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.au

Vancouver

Kliesch C. Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired? contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition. Journal of European Psychology Students. 2012 May 6;88-94. doi: 10.5334/jeps.au

Author

Kliesch, Christian. / Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired? contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition. In: Journal of European Psychology Students. 2012 ; pp. 88-94.

Bibtex

@article{ccf36b4439264a4d83f94c62ad0db653,
title = "Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired?: contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition",
abstract = "Proponents of a Universal Grammar argue that humans are born with a dedicated language system that shapes and restricts the number of grammars found in human languages (Chomsky, 2005). It is essentially innate and has a genetic manifestation. Such an innate system is necessary because human grammars are too complex to be passed on through social interactions and probabilistic learning alone. However, this view is contested by a combination of emergentist approaches and a number of studies suggest that many of the core assumptions of Universal Grammar are either unnecessary or do not hold. Furthermore, this review will explore theoretical criticism of the Universal Grammar research programme.",
keywords = "Universal Grammar, Language Acquisition, Language Evolution, Poverty of Stimulus, Nativism",
author = "Christian Kliesch",
year = "2012",
month = may,
day = "6",
doi = "10.5334/jeps.au",
language = "English",
pages = "88--94",
journal = "Journal of European Psychology Students",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of syntax – innate or acquired?

T2 - contrasting universal grammar with other approaches to language acquisition

AU - Kliesch, Christian

PY - 2012/5/6

Y1 - 2012/5/6

N2 - Proponents of a Universal Grammar argue that humans are born with a dedicated language system that shapes and restricts the number of grammars found in human languages (Chomsky, 2005). It is essentially innate and has a genetic manifestation. Such an innate system is necessary because human grammars are too complex to be passed on through social interactions and probabilistic learning alone. However, this view is contested by a combination of emergentist approaches and a number of studies suggest that many of the core assumptions of Universal Grammar are either unnecessary or do not hold. Furthermore, this review will explore theoretical criticism of the Universal Grammar research programme.

AB - Proponents of a Universal Grammar argue that humans are born with a dedicated language system that shapes and restricts the number of grammars found in human languages (Chomsky, 2005). It is essentially innate and has a genetic manifestation. Such an innate system is necessary because human grammars are too complex to be passed on through social interactions and probabilistic learning alone. However, this view is contested by a combination of emergentist approaches and a number of studies suggest that many of the core assumptions of Universal Grammar are either unnecessary or do not hold. Furthermore, this review will explore theoretical criticism of the Universal Grammar research programme.

KW - Universal Grammar

KW - Language Acquisition

KW - Language Evolution

KW - Poverty of Stimulus

KW - Nativism

U2 - 10.5334/jeps.au

DO - 10.5334/jeps.au

M3 - Journal article

SP - 88

EP - 94

JO - Journal of European Psychology Students

JF - Journal of European Psychology Students

ER -