Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradica...
View graph of relations

Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression. / Fraser, Rob W.; Cook, David C.; Mumford, John D. et al.
In: Journal of Pest Management, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2006, p. 261-268.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Fraser, RW, Cook, DC, Mumford, JD, Wilby, A & Waage, JK 2006, 'Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression.', Journal of Pest Management, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870600795930

APA

Fraser, R. W., Cook, D. C., Mumford, J. D., Wilby, A., & Waage, J. K. (2006). Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression. Journal of Pest Management, 52(4), 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870600795930

Vancouver

Fraser RW, Cook DC, Mumford JD, Wilby A, Waage JK. Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression. Journal of Pest Management. 2006;52(4):261-268. doi: 10.1080/09670870600795930

Author

Fraser, Rob W. ; Cook, David C. ; Mumford, John D. et al. / Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression. In: Journal of Pest Management. 2006 ; Vol. 52, No. 4. pp. 261-268.

Bibtex

@article{ff0baea3083844d5aa753644d4b7dd5d,
title = "Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression.",
abstract = "A framework is developed to evaluate eradication as one of three alternative management responses to an outbreak of an invasive species: eradication, suppression or no action. This framework can be used to establish under what conditions an eradication option could provide an expected net economic benefit, and whether this net benefit exceeds that of the other two options. The eradication option is more likely to be preferred in situations where there is an immediate export benefit that is derived from eradication of the outbreak, and also the uncertainty associated with the likely success of eradication is low.",
keywords = "Invasive species, eradication, export benefit",
author = "Fraser, {Rob W.} and Cook, {David C.} and Mumford, {John D.} and Andrew Wilby and Waage, {Jeff K.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/09670870600795930",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "261--268",
journal = "Journal of Pest Management",
issn = "0967-0874",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing outbreaks of invasive species: Eradication versus suppression.

AU - Fraser, Rob W.

AU - Cook, David C.

AU - Mumford, John D.

AU - Wilby, Andrew

AU - Waage, Jeff K.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - A framework is developed to evaluate eradication as one of three alternative management responses to an outbreak of an invasive species: eradication, suppression or no action. This framework can be used to establish under what conditions an eradication option could provide an expected net economic benefit, and whether this net benefit exceeds that of the other two options. The eradication option is more likely to be preferred in situations where there is an immediate export benefit that is derived from eradication of the outbreak, and also the uncertainty associated with the likely success of eradication is low.

AB - A framework is developed to evaluate eradication as one of three alternative management responses to an outbreak of an invasive species: eradication, suppression or no action. This framework can be used to establish under what conditions an eradication option could provide an expected net economic benefit, and whether this net benefit exceeds that of the other two options. The eradication option is more likely to be preferred in situations where there is an immediate export benefit that is derived from eradication of the outbreak, and also the uncertainty associated with the likely success of eradication is low.

KW - Invasive species

KW - eradication

KW - export benefit

U2 - 10.1080/09670870600795930

DO - 10.1080/09670870600795930

M3 - Journal article

VL - 52

SP - 261

EP - 268

JO - Journal of Pest Management

JF - Journal of Pest Management

SN - 0967-0874

IS - 4

ER -