Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mapping habitat indices across river networks u...

Electronic data

  • Naura et al Mapping habitat indices 2016-revised

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Indicators. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Indicators, 66, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019

    Accepted author manuscript, 2.9 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data. / Naura, Marc; Clark, Mike J.; Sear, David A. et al.
In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 66, 07.2016, p. 20-29.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Naura, M, Clark, MJ, Sear, DA, Atkinson, PM, Hornby, DD, Kemp, P, England, J, Peirson, G, Bromley, C & Carter, MG 2016, 'Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data', Ecological Indicators, vol. 66, pp. 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019

APA

Naura, M., Clark, M. J., Sear, D. A., Atkinson, P. M., Hornby, D. D., Kemp, P., England, J., Peirson, G., Bromley, C., & Carter, M. G. (2016). Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data. Ecological Indicators, 66, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019

Vancouver

Naura M, Clark MJ, Sear DA, Atkinson PM, Hornby DD, Kemp P et al. Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data. Ecological Indicators. 2016 Jul;66:20-29. Epub 2016 Feb 1. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019

Author

Naura, Marc ; Clark, Mike J. ; Sear, David A. et al. / Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data. In: Ecological Indicators. 2016 ; Vol. 66. pp. 20-29.

Bibtex

@article{ba88760749324c65bf20b366dcd958bc,
title = "Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data",
abstract = "Freshwater ecosystems are declining faster than their terrestrial and marine counterparts because of physical pressures on habitats. European legislation requires member states to achieve ecological targets through the effective management of freshwater habitats. Maps of habitats across river networks would help diagnose environmental problems and plan for the delivery of improvement work. Existing habitat mapping methods are generally time consuming, require experts and are expensive to implement. Surveys based on sampling are cheaper but provide patchy representations of habitat distribution. In this study, we present a method for mapping habitat indices across networks using semi-quantitative data and a geostatistical technique called regression kriging. The method consists of the derivation of habitat indices using multivariate statistical techniques that are regressed on map-based covariates such as altitude, slope and geology. Regression kriging combines the Generalised Least Squares (GLS) regression technique with a spatial analysis of model residuals. Predictions from the GLS model are {\textquoteleft}corrected{\textquoteright} using weighted averages of model residuals following an analysis of spatial correlation. The method was applied to channel substrate data from the River Habitat Survey in Great Britain. A Channel Substrate Index (CSI) was derived using Correspondence Analysis and predicted using regression kriging. The model explained 74% of the main sample variability and 64% in a test sample. The model was applied to the English and Welsh river network and a map of CSI was produced. The proposed approach demonstrates how existing national monitoring data and geostatistical techniques can be used to produce continuous maps of habitat indices at the national scale.",
keywords = "Habitat mapping, Habitat indices, Channel substrate, Regression kriging, River Habitat Survey, Geostatistics",
author = "Marc Naura and Clark, {Mike J.} and Sear, {David A.} and Atkinson, {Peter Michael} and Hornby, {Duncan D.} and Paul Kemp and Judy England and Graeme Peirson and Chris Bromley and Carter, {Matthew G.}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Indicators. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Indicators, 66, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "20--29",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping habitat indices across river networks using spatial statistical modelling of River Habitat Survey data

AU - Naura, Marc

AU - Clark, Mike J.

AU - Sear, David A.

AU - Atkinson, Peter Michael

AU - Hornby, Duncan D.

AU - Kemp, Paul

AU - England, Judy

AU - Peirson, Graeme

AU - Bromley, Chris

AU - Carter, Matthew G.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Indicators. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Indicators, 66, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - Freshwater ecosystems are declining faster than their terrestrial and marine counterparts because of physical pressures on habitats. European legislation requires member states to achieve ecological targets through the effective management of freshwater habitats. Maps of habitats across river networks would help diagnose environmental problems and plan for the delivery of improvement work. Existing habitat mapping methods are generally time consuming, require experts and are expensive to implement. Surveys based on sampling are cheaper but provide patchy representations of habitat distribution. In this study, we present a method for mapping habitat indices across networks using semi-quantitative data and a geostatistical technique called regression kriging. The method consists of the derivation of habitat indices using multivariate statistical techniques that are regressed on map-based covariates such as altitude, slope and geology. Regression kriging combines the Generalised Least Squares (GLS) regression technique with a spatial analysis of model residuals. Predictions from the GLS model are ‘corrected’ using weighted averages of model residuals following an analysis of spatial correlation. The method was applied to channel substrate data from the River Habitat Survey in Great Britain. A Channel Substrate Index (CSI) was derived using Correspondence Analysis and predicted using regression kriging. The model explained 74% of the main sample variability and 64% in a test sample. The model was applied to the English and Welsh river network and a map of CSI was produced. The proposed approach demonstrates how existing national monitoring data and geostatistical techniques can be used to produce continuous maps of habitat indices at the national scale.

AB - Freshwater ecosystems are declining faster than their terrestrial and marine counterparts because of physical pressures on habitats. European legislation requires member states to achieve ecological targets through the effective management of freshwater habitats. Maps of habitats across river networks would help diagnose environmental problems and plan for the delivery of improvement work. Existing habitat mapping methods are generally time consuming, require experts and are expensive to implement. Surveys based on sampling are cheaper but provide patchy representations of habitat distribution. In this study, we present a method for mapping habitat indices across networks using semi-quantitative data and a geostatistical technique called regression kriging. The method consists of the derivation of habitat indices using multivariate statistical techniques that are regressed on map-based covariates such as altitude, slope and geology. Regression kriging combines the Generalised Least Squares (GLS) regression technique with a spatial analysis of model residuals. Predictions from the GLS model are ‘corrected’ using weighted averages of model residuals following an analysis of spatial correlation. The method was applied to channel substrate data from the River Habitat Survey in Great Britain. A Channel Substrate Index (CSI) was derived using Correspondence Analysis and predicted using regression kriging. The model explained 74% of the main sample variability and 64% in a test sample. The model was applied to the English and Welsh river network and a map of CSI was produced. The proposed approach demonstrates how existing national monitoring data and geostatistical techniques can be used to produce continuous maps of habitat indices at the national scale.

KW - Habitat mapping

KW - Habitat indices

KW - Channel substrate

KW - Regression kriging

KW - River Habitat Survey

KW - Geostatistics

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.019

M3 - Journal article

VL - 66

SP - 20

EP - 29

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -