Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Married in the Military

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Married in the Military: Relationship Satisfaction and Distress Among Serving U.K. Couples

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Married in the Military: Relationship Satisfaction and Distress Among Serving U.K. Couples. / Gribble, R.; Goodwin, L.; Fear, N.T.
In: Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 07.04.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Gribble, R., Goodwin, L., & Fear, N. T. (2025). Married in the Military: Relationship Satisfaction and Distress Among Serving U.K. Couples. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000282

Vancouver

Gribble R, Goodwin L, Fear NT. Married in the Military: Relationship Satisfaction and Distress Among Serving U.K. Couples. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice. 2025 Apr 7. Epub 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000282

Author

Gribble, R. ; Goodwin, L. ; Fear, N.T. / Married in the Military : Relationship Satisfaction and Distress Among Serving U.K. Couples. In: Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice. 2025.

Bibtex

@article{b3e3dddc85c749d79a6d299d88e94979,
title = "Married in the Military: Relationship Satisfaction and Distress Among Serving U.K. Couples",
abstract = "The competing demands of the military can adversely affect the relationships of military couples. However, there is little U.K. research, and most research focuses only on the role of personnel mental health on relationship outcomes. Data from 219 female partner/male military personnel couples collected during a study of military-connected children (2010–2012) were used to determine relationship distress among U.K. serving military couples (Dyadic Adjustment Scale–7 < 21). Dyadic analyses were used to examine associations between individual couple member Dyadic Adjustment Scale–7 scores and sociodemographic, military, and health factors. 29.2% of personnel and 26.9% of partners met criteria for relationship distress; 41.5% of couples contained at least one member who met criteria. Relationship satisfaction was associated with relationship satisfaction in the other couple member (β = 0.460), partner posttraumatic stress disorder scores (β = −0.276), and lower personnel rank (β = −0.344). Partners of personnel of lower rank and personnel with increased posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms may be more at risk of lower relationship satisfaction. Findings highlight the importance of examining the mental health of both serving and nonserving couple members when examining military family outcomes given the impact of partner health on personnel relationship satisfaction. Additional information should be provided to military partners and couples on the realities of Service life prior to joining, with greater advertisement of military initiatives to raise awareness of available services for personnel and their partners.",
author = "R. Gribble and L. Goodwin and N.T. Fear",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1037/cfp0000282",
language = "English",
journal = "Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "2160-4096",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Married in the Military

T2 - Relationship Satisfaction and Distress Among Serving U.K. Couples

AU - Gribble, R.

AU - Goodwin, L.

AU - Fear, N.T.

PY - 2025/4/7

Y1 - 2025/4/7

N2 - The competing demands of the military can adversely affect the relationships of military couples. However, there is little U.K. research, and most research focuses only on the role of personnel mental health on relationship outcomes. Data from 219 female partner/male military personnel couples collected during a study of military-connected children (2010–2012) were used to determine relationship distress among U.K. serving military couples (Dyadic Adjustment Scale–7 < 21). Dyadic analyses were used to examine associations between individual couple member Dyadic Adjustment Scale–7 scores and sociodemographic, military, and health factors. 29.2% of personnel and 26.9% of partners met criteria for relationship distress; 41.5% of couples contained at least one member who met criteria. Relationship satisfaction was associated with relationship satisfaction in the other couple member (β = 0.460), partner posttraumatic stress disorder scores (β = −0.276), and lower personnel rank (β = −0.344). Partners of personnel of lower rank and personnel with increased posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms may be more at risk of lower relationship satisfaction. Findings highlight the importance of examining the mental health of both serving and nonserving couple members when examining military family outcomes given the impact of partner health on personnel relationship satisfaction. Additional information should be provided to military partners and couples on the realities of Service life prior to joining, with greater advertisement of military initiatives to raise awareness of available services for personnel and their partners.

AB - The competing demands of the military can adversely affect the relationships of military couples. However, there is little U.K. research, and most research focuses only on the role of personnel mental health on relationship outcomes. Data from 219 female partner/male military personnel couples collected during a study of military-connected children (2010–2012) were used to determine relationship distress among U.K. serving military couples (Dyadic Adjustment Scale–7 < 21). Dyadic analyses were used to examine associations between individual couple member Dyadic Adjustment Scale–7 scores and sociodemographic, military, and health factors. 29.2% of personnel and 26.9% of partners met criteria for relationship distress; 41.5% of couples contained at least one member who met criteria. Relationship satisfaction was associated with relationship satisfaction in the other couple member (β = 0.460), partner posttraumatic stress disorder scores (β = −0.276), and lower personnel rank (β = −0.344). Partners of personnel of lower rank and personnel with increased posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms may be more at risk of lower relationship satisfaction. Findings highlight the importance of examining the mental health of both serving and nonserving couple members when examining military family outcomes given the impact of partner health on personnel relationship satisfaction. Additional information should be provided to military partners and couples on the realities of Service life prior to joining, with greater advertisement of military initiatives to raise awareness of available services for personnel and their partners.

U2 - 10.1037/cfp0000282

DO - 10.1037/cfp0000282

M3 - Journal article

JO - Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 2160-4096

ER -