Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Material flow analysis of China’s five commodit...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement. / Jian, Xiaomei; Wang, Peng; Sun, Ningning et al.
In: Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 2, 025002, 01.06.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jian, X, Wang, P, Sun, N, Xu, W, Liu, L, Ma, Y & Chen, WQ 2022, 'Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement', Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 2, 025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642

APA

Jian, X., Wang, P., Sun, N., Xu, W., Liu, L., Ma, Y., & Chen, W. Q. (2022). Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 2(2), Article 025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642

Vancouver

Jian X, Wang P, Sun N, Xu W, Liu L, Ma Y et al. Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability. 2022 Jun 1;2(2):025002. Epub 2022 May 18. doi: 10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642

Author

Jian, Xiaomei ; Wang, Peng ; Sun, Ningning et al. / Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement. In: Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability. 2022 ; Vol. 2, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{06ef206b587449d9a3c1b3897c1d7394,
title = "Material flow analysis of China{\textquoteright}s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement",
abstract = "Plastic waste is one of the most pressing global environmental challenges. As the world{\textquoteright}s largest plastic waste generator and importer, China has implemented various policies to promote sustainable plastic waste management. However, the quantitative understanding of China{\textquoteright}s application-specific plastic waste recycling and its infrastructure development is still quite limited. Here, we build up a unified framework to investigate the recycling and the corresponding infrastructure status of five commodity plastics in China, which are polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PE, PP, PVC, PS, ABS) from 2000-2019. We find that: (1) in total, China consumed around 981.4 million tons (Mt) of the five commodity plastics from 2000-2019, generating 590.4 Mt of plastic waste, only 27% of which was recycled, 34% was landfilled and 32% was incinerated; (2) PP (∼30%) and PE (∼28%) have the highest recycling rate in China, which is related to their huge consumption base, while PS and ABS have the lowest recycling rate at only ∼26%; (3) the waste recycling performance is determined by its applications, and the worst recycling rates (<20%) are the packaging and commodity sectors due to their poor collection, while higher recycling rates (⩾30%) are found in the building and construction, agriculture and transportation sectors due to the special waste collection systems in these sectors; (4) our further examination of the recycling potential reveals that around 56% of packaging waste can be recycled by adjusting waste management infrastructure (in the collection, pre- and end-processing). Our results can help bridge information gaps and support policymaking to improve sustainable plastic waste management.",
keywords = "industrial ecology, material flow analysis, plastics, recycling, waste infrastructure",
author = "Xiaomei Jian and Peng Wang and Ningning Sun and Wen Xu and Lingxuan Liu and Yichun Ma and Chen, {Wei Qiang}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability",
issn = "2634-4505",
publisher = "IOP Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement

AU - Jian, Xiaomei

AU - Wang, Peng

AU - Sun, Ningning

AU - Xu, Wen

AU - Liu, Lingxuan

AU - Ma, Yichun

AU - Chen, Wei Qiang

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.

PY - 2022/6/1

Y1 - 2022/6/1

N2 - Plastic waste is one of the most pressing global environmental challenges. As the world’s largest plastic waste generator and importer, China has implemented various policies to promote sustainable plastic waste management. However, the quantitative understanding of China’s application-specific plastic waste recycling and its infrastructure development is still quite limited. Here, we build up a unified framework to investigate the recycling and the corresponding infrastructure status of five commodity plastics in China, which are polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PE, PP, PVC, PS, ABS) from 2000-2019. We find that: (1) in total, China consumed around 981.4 million tons (Mt) of the five commodity plastics from 2000-2019, generating 590.4 Mt of plastic waste, only 27% of which was recycled, 34% was landfilled and 32% was incinerated; (2) PP (∼30%) and PE (∼28%) have the highest recycling rate in China, which is related to their huge consumption base, while PS and ABS have the lowest recycling rate at only ∼26%; (3) the waste recycling performance is determined by its applications, and the worst recycling rates (<20%) are the packaging and commodity sectors due to their poor collection, while higher recycling rates (⩾30%) are found in the building and construction, agriculture and transportation sectors due to the special waste collection systems in these sectors; (4) our further examination of the recycling potential reveals that around 56% of packaging waste can be recycled by adjusting waste management infrastructure (in the collection, pre- and end-processing). Our results can help bridge information gaps and support policymaking to improve sustainable plastic waste management.

AB - Plastic waste is one of the most pressing global environmental challenges. As the world’s largest plastic waste generator and importer, China has implemented various policies to promote sustainable plastic waste management. However, the quantitative understanding of China’s application-specific plastic waste recycling and its infrastructure development is still quite limited. Here, we build up a unified framework to investigate the recycling and the corresponding infrastructure status of five commodity plastics in China, which are polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PE, PP, PVC, PS, ABS) from 2000-2019. We find that: (1) in total, China consumed around 981.4 million tons (Mt) of the five commodity plastics from 2000-2019, generating 590.4 Mt of plastic waste, only 27% of which was recycled, 34% was landfilled and 32% was incinerated; (2) PP (∼30%) and PE (∼28%) have the highest recycling rate in China, which is related to their huge consumption base, while PS and ABS have the lowest recycling rate at only ∼26%; (3) the waste recycling performance is determined by its applications, and the worst recycling rates (<20%) are the packaging and commodity sectors due to their poor collection, while higher recycling rates (⩾30%) are found in the building and construction, agriculture and transportation sectors due to the special waste collection systems in these sectors; (4) our further examination of the recycling potential reveals that around 56% of packaging waste can be recycled by adjusting waste management infrastructure (in the collection, pre- and end-processing). Our results can help bridge information gaps and support policymaking to improve sustainable plastic waste management.

KW - industrial ecology

KW - material flow analysis

KW - plastics

KW - recycling

KW - waste infrastructure

U2 - 10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642

DO - 10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85181109815

VL - 2

JO - Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability

JF - Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability

SN - 2634-4505

IS - 2

M1 - 025002

ER -