Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Maternal outcasts
View graph of relations

Maternal outcasts: raising the profile of women who are vulnerable to successive, compulsory removals of their children – a plea for preventative action

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Maternal outcasts : raising the profile of women who are vulnerable to successive, compulsory removals of their children – a plea for preventative action. / Broadhurst, Karen; Mason, Claire.

In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 35, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 291-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{e08151b9cc4642d3b308e3b684a727d7,
title = "Maternal outcasts: raising the profile of women who are vulnerable to successive, compulsory removals of their children – a plea for preventative action",
abstract = "This paper concerns policy and practice responses to birth mothers who experience successive, permanent removal of their children to state care and/or adoption. The central argument of this paper is that, to date, the rehabilitative needs of this population of birth mothers have fallen outside the remit of statutory agencies. Moreover, the extant literature offers little by way of definitive findings in respect of the size of this population or rehabilitative options. Indeed, a marked absence of discussion within mainstream policy circles renders this population hidden, only hinted at in profiling studies that note the sequential removal of siblings through public law care proceedings. Conceptualising this population of women as {\textquoteleft}maternal outcasts{\textquoteright} who bear the stigma of spoiled motherhood, we consider a range of factors that impact on this population's continued exclusion. Falling so far outside normative expectations of motherhood and presenting with multiple problems of daily living, there is no doubt that this population raises particular practical, ethical and legal challenges. However, these challenges should not stand in the way of a concerted prevention agenda.",
keywords = "birth mothers, care proceedings, rehabilitation, post-adoption",
author = "Karen Broadhurst and Claire Mason",
year = "2013",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09649069.2013.805061",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "291--304",
journal = "Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law",
issn = "0964-9069",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maternal outcasts

T2 - raising the profile of women who are vulnerable to successive, compulsory removals of their children – a plea for preventative action

AU - Broadhurst, Karen

AU - Mason, Claire

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - This paper concerns policy and practice responses to birth mothers who experience successive, permanent removal of their children to state care and/or adoption. The central argument of this paper is that, to date, the rehabilitative needs of this population of birth mothers have fallen outside the remit of statutory agencies. Moreover, the extant literature offers little by way of definitive findings in respect of the size of this population or rehabilitative options. Indeed, a marked absence of discussion within mainstream policy circles renders this population hidden, only hinted at in profiling studies that note the sequential removal of siblings through public law care proceedings. Conceptualising this population of women as ‘maternal outcasts’ who bear the stigma of spoiled motherhood, we consider a range of factors that impact on this population's continued exclusion. Falling so far outside normative expectations of motherhood and presenting with multiple problems of daily living, there is no doubt that this population raises particular practical, ethical and legal challenges. However, these challenges should not stand in the way of a concerted prevention agenda.

AB - This paper concerns policy and practice responses to birth mothers who experience successive, permanent removal of their children to state care and/or adoption. The central argument of this paper is that, to date, the rehabilitative needs of this population of birth mothers have fallen outside the remit of statutory agencies. Moreover, the extant literature offers little by way of definitive findings in respect of the size of this population or rehabilitative options. Indeed, a marked absence of discussion within mainstream policy circles renders this population hidden, only hinted at in profiling studies that note the sequential removal of siblings through public law care proceedings. Conceptualising this population of women as ‘maternal outcasts’ who bear the stigma of spoiled motherhood, we consider a range of factors that impact on this population's continued exclusion. Falling so far outside normative expectations of motherhood and presenting with multiple problems of daily living, there is no doubt that this population raises particular practical, ethical and legal challenges. However, these challenges should not stand in the way of a concerted prevention agenda.

KW - birth mothers

KW - care proceedings

KW - rehabilitation

KW - post-adoption

U2 - 10.1080/09649069.2013.805061

DO - 10.1080/09649069.2013.805061

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 291

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

JF - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

SN - 0964-9069

IS - 3

ER -