Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Meaningful practices

Electronic data

  • CRRE 10.2_art_Evans_FINAL_clean

    Accepted author manuscript, 302 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Meaningful practices: The contemporary relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Meaningful practices : The contemporary relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures. / Walker, Stuart; Evans, Martyn; Mullagh, Louise.

In: Craft Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 30.11.2019, p. 183-210.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{09af35a24df34d8f9a2c23bb7ba180fd,
title = "Meaningful practices: The contemporary relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures",
abstract = "This article explores the relationship between design for sustainability and traditional making practices. It presents results from key informant interviews and observational research into traditional hand making of functional goods in Santa Fe in the United States, Jingdezhen, China, various locations in New South Wales, Australia and Cumbria, United Kingdom. We find that such goods fall into three main categories, primarily utilitarian, symbolic and aesthetic. These practices are discussed in terms of their contemporary relevance, potential futures and relationship to current understandings of sustainability. More specifically, they are considered against the four elements of the Quadruple Bottom Line of Design for Sustainability (Walker 2014), a rigorous interpretation extended from the philosophy of Hick (1989), which comprises: practical meaning including environmental impacts; social meaning; personal meaning; and economic means. The originality of this research lies in the development of new arguments and insights with regard to the complex issues of design for sustainability and traditional making practices. Significantly, we find that many of these practices are intellectually consistent with broad, contemporary understandings of design for sustainability. However, we also find that it is often not easy to reconcile these practices with modern consumer culture. Our research shows that pursuing these practices part-time for their own sake, rather than for primarily commercial reasons can often facilitate the pursuit of excellence and the continuation of cultural traditions.",
keywords = "design, handmade artefacts, meaning, place-based making, sustainability, traditional making practices",
author = "Stuart Walker and Martyn Evans and Louise Mullagh",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1386/crre_00002_1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "183--210",
journal = "Craft Research",
issn = "2040-4689",
publisher = "Intellect",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meaningful practices

T2 - The contemporary relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures

AU - Walker, Stuart

AU - Evans, Martyn

AU - Mullagh, Louise

PY - 2019/11/30

Y1 - 2019/11/30

N2 - This article explores the relationship between design for sustainability and traditional making practices. It presents results from key informant interviews and observational research into traditional hand making of functional goods in Santa Fe in the United States, Jingdezhen, China, various locations in New South Wales, Australia and Cumbria, United Kingdom. We find that such goods fall into three main categories, primarily utilitarian, symbolic and aesthetic. These practices are discussed in terms of their contemporary relevance, potential futures and relationship to current understandings of sustainability. More specifically, they are considered against the four elements of the Quadruple Bottom Line of Design for Sustainability (Walker 2014), a rigorous interpretation extended from the philosophy of Hick (1989), which comprises: practical meaning including environmental impacts; social meaning; personal meaning; and economic means. The originality of this research lies in the development of new arguments and insights with regard to the complex issues of design for sustainability and traditional making practices. Significantly, we find that many of these practices are intellectually consistent with broad, contemporary understandings of design for sustainability. However, we also find that it is often not easy to reconcile these practices with modern consumer culture. Our research shows that pursuing these practices part-time for their own sake, rather than for primarily commercial reasons can often facilitate the pursuit of excellence and the continuation of cultural traditions.

AB - This article explores the relationship between design for sustainability and traditional making practices. It presents results from key informant interviews and observational research into traditional hand making of functional goods in Santa Fe in the United States, Jingdezhen, China, various locations in New South Wales, Australia and Cumbria, United Kingdom. We find that such goods fall into three main categories, primarily utilitarian, symbolic and aesthetic. These practices are discussed in terms of their contemporary relevance, potential futures and relationship to current understandings of sustainability. More specifically, they are considered against the four elements of the Quadruple Bottom Line of Design for Sustainability (Walker 2014), a rigorous interpretation extended from the philosophy of Hick (1989), which comprises: practical meaning including environmental impacts; social meaning; personal meaning; and economic means. The originality of this research lies in the development of new arguments and insights with regard to the complex issues of design for sustainability and traditional making practices. Significantly, we find that many of these practices are intellectually consistent with broad, contemporary understandings of design for sustainability. However, we also find that it is often not easy to reconcile these practices with modern consumer culture. Our research shows that pursuing these practices part-time for their own sake, rather than for primarily commercial reasons can often facilitate the pursuit of excellence and the continuation of cultural traditions.

KW - design

KW - handmade artefacts

KW - meaning

KW - place-based making

KW - sustainability

KW - traditional making practices

U2 - 10.1386/crre_00002_1

DO - 10.1386/crre_00002_1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 183

EP - 210

JO - Craft Research

JF - Craft Research

SN - 2040-4689

IS - 2

ER -