Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical ...

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates. / Plug, Leendert; Lennon, Robert; Smith, Rachel.
Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 2019 Melbourne, 2019.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Plug, L, Lennon, R & Smith, R 2019, Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates. in Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. vol. 2019, Melbourne, Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, 5/08/19. <https://icphs2019.org/icphs2019-fullpapers/pdf/full-paper_611.pdf>

APA

Plug, L., Lennon, R., & Smith, R. (2019). Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 2019). https://icphs2019.org/icphs2019-fullpapers/pdf/full-paper_611.pdf

Vancouver

Plug L, Lennon R, Smith R. Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 2019. Melbourne. 2019

Author

Plug, Leendert ; Lennon, Robert ; Smith, Rachel. / Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Vol. 2019 Melbourne, 2019.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{a75f281e301f42aa866af1a5e79dd87e,
title = "Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates",
abstract = "Studies that quantify speech tempo tend to use one of various available rate measures. The relationship between these measures and perceived tempo as elicited through listening experiments remains poorly understood. We assess how canonical and surface syllable and phone rates compare in terms of their mapping to listeners' tempo ratings. Native speakers of English rated short stretches of spontaneous speech for tempo; we modelled ratings for stimulus samples in which correlations between canonical and surface rates were low. Our findings suggest that listeners' ratings map most straightforwardly to canonical rate for syllables, but to surface rates for phones. We find little evidence of global tempo affecting the mappings, and consistent effects of stimulus duration. We discuss implications for the role of phoneme restoration in temporal processing.",
keywords = "phonetics, speech perception, tempo, phoneme restoration, English",
author = "Leendert Plug and Robert Lennon and Rachel Smith",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences",
note = "Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS '19 ; Conference date: 05-08-2019 Through 09-08-2019",
url = "https://www.icphs2019.org/",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Measured and perceived speech tempo: Canonical vs surface syllable and phone rates

AU - Plug, Leendert

AU - Lennon, Robert

AU - Smith, Rachel

PY - 2019/8/4

Y1 - 2019/8/4

N2 - Studies that quantify speech tempo tend to use one of various available rate measures. The relationship between these measures and perceived tempo as elicited through listening experiments remains poorly understood. We assess how canonical and surface syllable and phone rates compare in terms of their mapping to listeners' tempo ratings. Native speakers of English rated short stretches of spontaneous speech for tempo; we modelled ratings for stimulus samples in which correlations between canonical and surface rates were low. Our findings suggest that listeners' ratings map most straightforwardly to canonical rate for syllables, but to surface rates for phones. We find little evidence of global tempo affecting the mappings, and consistent effects of stimulus duration. We discuss implications for the role of phoneme restoration in temporal processing.

AB - Studies that quantify speech tempo tend to use one of various available rate measures. The relationship between these measures and perceived tempo as elicited through listening experiments remains poorly understood. We assess how canonical and surface syllable and phone rates compare in terms of their mapping to listeners' tempo ratings. Native speakers of English rated short stretches of spontaneous speech for tempo; we modelled ratings for stimulus samples in which correlations between canonical and surface rates were low. Our findings suggest that listeners' ratings map most straightforwardly to canonical rate for syllables, but to surface rates for phones. We find little evidence of global tempo affecting the mappings, and consistent effects of stimulus duration. We discuss implications for the role of phoneme restoration in temporal processing.

KW - phonetics

KW - speech perception

KW - tempo

KW - phoneme restoration

KW - English

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

VL - 2019

BT - Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences

CY - Melbourne

T2 - Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences

Y2 - 5 August 2019 through 9 August 2019

ER -