Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining. / Winter, E.
In: Theory and Decision, Vol. 40, No. 2, 03.1996, p. 131-147.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Winter, E 1996, 'Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining', Theory and Decision, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133170

APA

Vancouver

Winter E. Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining. Theory and Decision. 1996 Mar;40(2):131-147. doi: 10.1007/BF00133170

Author

Winter, E. / Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining. In: Theory and Decision. 1996 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 131-147.

Bibtex

@article{1f9e6116ba5d4c2ebcada67a764391a0,
title = "Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining",
abstract = "This paper discusses the relationship between coalitional stability and the robustness of bargaining outcomes to the bargaining procedure. We consider a class of bargaining procedures described by extensive form games, where payoff opportunities are given by a characteristic function (cooperative) game. The extensive form games differ on the probability distribution assigned to chance moves which determine the order in which players take actions. One way to define mechanism robustness is in terms of the property of 'no first mover advantage'. An equilibrium is mechanism robust if for each member the expected payoff before and after being called to propose is the same. Alternatively one can define mechanism robustness as a property of equilibrium outcomes. An outcome is said to be mechanism robust if it is supported by some equilibrium in all the extensive form games (mechanisms) within our class. We show that both definitions of mechanism robustness provide an interesting characterization of the core of the underlying cooperative game. {\textcopyright} 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.",
keywords = "Bargaining, Core, Mechanism robustness",
author = "E. Winter",
year = "1996",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/BF00133170",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "131--147",
journal = "Theory and Decision",
issn = "0040-5833",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanism robustness in multilateral bargaining

AU - Winter, E.

PY - 1996/3

Y1 - 1996/3

N2 - This paper discusses the relationship between coalitional stability and the robustness of bargaining outcomes to the bargaining procedure. We consider a class of bargaining procedures described by extensive form games, where payoff opportunities are given by a characteristic function (cooperative) game. The extensive form games differ on the probability distribution assigned to chance moves which determine the order in which players take actions. One way to define mechanism robustness is in terms of the property of 'no first mover advantage'. An equilibrium is mechanism robust if for each member the expected payoff before and after being called to propose is the same. Alternatively one can define mechanism robustness as a property of equilibrium outcomes. An outcome is said to be mechanism robust if it is supported by some equilibrium in all the extensive form games (mechanisms) within our class. We show that both definitions of mechanism robustness provide an interesting characterization of the core of the underlying cooperative game. © 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

AB - This paper discusses the relationship between coalitional stability and the robustness of bargaining outcomes to the bargaining procedure. We consider a class of bargaining procedures described by extensive form games, where payoff opportunities are given by a characteristic function (cooperative) game. The extensive form games differ on the probability distribution assigned to chance moves which determine the order in which players take actions. One way to define mechanism robustness is in terms of the property of 'no first mover advantage'. An equilibrium is mechanism robust if for each member the expected payoff before and after being called to propose is the same. Alternatively one can define mechanism robustness as a property of equilibrium outcomes. An outcome is said to be mechanism robust if it is supported by some equilibrium in all the extensive form games (mechanisms) within our class. We show that both definitions of mechanism robustness provide an interesting characterization of the core of the underlying cooperative game. © 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

KW - Bargaining

KW - Core

KW - Mechanism robustness

U2 - 10.1007/BF00133170

DO - 10.1007/BF00133170

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 131

EP - 147

JO - Theory and Decision

JF - Theory and Decision

SN - 0040-5833

IS - 2

ER -