Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mentorship and creativity

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mentorship and creativity: Effects of mentor creativity and mentoring style

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Mentorship and creativity: Effects of mentor creativity and mentoring style. / Wang, Jian; Shibayama, Sotaro.
In: Research Policy, Vol. 51, No. 3, 104451, 30.04.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wang J, Shibayama S. Mentorship and creativity: Effects of mentor creativity and mentoring style. Research Policy. 2022 Apr 30;51(3):104451. Epub 2021 Dec 16. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104451

Author

Wang, Jian ; Shibayama, Sotaro. / Mentorship and creativity : Effects of mentor creativity and mentoring style. In: Research Policy. 2022 ; Vol. 51, No. 3.

Bibtex

@article{9637c383b5e74565862aeabed05bcfc2,
title = "Mentorship and creativity: Effects of mentor creativity and mentoring style",
abstract = "This paper examines mentorship as a mechanism for individuals to acquire and develop creativity. More specifically, we study the effect of mentor creativity on prot{\'e}g{\'e} creativity and how this effect is moderated by the mentoring styles of autonomy and exploration. Our empirical analysis focuses on formal PhD supervision and training, drawing on survey and bibliometric data for 143 life-science professors (mentors) and their 685 PhD students (prot{\'e}g{\'e}s). We find that the effect of mentor creativity on prot{\'e}g{\'e} creativity is insignificant during prot{\'e}g{\'e}s{\textquoteright} PhD studies but becomes significantly positive after prot{\'e}g{\'e}s hold faculty positions, suggesting that the mentorship effect takes time to manifest but is enduring. Furthermore, the effect of mentor creativity on prot{\'e}g{\'e} creativity is significant only when prot{\'e}g{\'e}s have high levels of autonomy and exploration during PhD studies. This suggests the importance of autonomy and exploration in the effective transfer of creativity from mentors to prot{\'e}g{\'e}s.",
keywords = "Academic training, Autonomy, Creativity, Exploration, Mentorship",
author = "Jian Wang and Sotaro Shibayama",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2021.104451",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentorship and creativity

T2 - Effects of mentor creativity and mentoring style

AU - Wang, Jian

AU - Shibayama, Sotaro

PY - 2022/4/30

Y1 - 2022/4/30

N2 - This paper examines mentorship as a mechanism for individuals to acquire and develop creativity. More specifically, we study the effect of mentor creativity on protégé creativity and how this effect is moderated by the mentoring styles of autonomy and exploration. Our empirical analysis focuses on formal PhD supervision and training, drawing on survey and bibliometric data for 143 life-science professors (mentors) and their 685 PhD students (protégés). We find that the effect of mentor creativity on protégé creativity is insignificant during protégés’ PhD studies but becomes significantly positive after protégés hold faculty positions, suggesting that the mentorship effect takes time to manifest but is enduring. Furthermore, the effect of mentor creativity on protégé creativity is significant only when protégés have high levels of autonomy and exploration during PhD studies. This suggests the importance of autonomy and exploration in the effective transfer of creativity from mentors to protégés.

AB - This paper examines mentorship as a mechanism for individuals to acquire and develop creativity. More specifically, we study the effect of mentor creativity on protégé creativity and how this effect is moderated by the mentoring styles of autonomy and exploration. Our empirical analysis focuses on formal PhD supervision and training, drawing on survey and bibliometric data for 143 life-science professors (mentors) and their 685 PhD students (protégés). We find that the effect of mentor creativity on protégé creativity is insignificant during protégés’ PhD studies but becomes significantly positive after protégés hold faculty positions, suggesting that the mentorship effect takes time to manifest but is enduring. Furthermore, the effect of mentor creativity on protégé creativity is significant only when protégés have high levels of autonomy and exploration during PhD studies. This suggests the importance of autonomy and exploration in the effective transfer of creativity from mentors to protégés.

KW - Academic training

KW - Autonomy

KW - Creativity

KW - Exploration

KW - Mentorship

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104451

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104451

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85121250161

VL - 51

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 3

M1 - 104451

ER -