Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY
View graph of relations

MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY: A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY: A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY? / Ingham, Hilary; Kran, Ingvild; Lovestam, Andre.
In: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2, 31.03.1992, p. 195-208.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Ingham, H, Kran, I & Lovestam, A 1992, 'MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY: A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY?', Journal of Management Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00660.x

APA

Ingham, H., Kran, I., & Lovestam, A. (1992). MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY: A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY? Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00660.x

Vancouver

Ingham H, Kran I, Lovestam A. MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY: A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY? Journal of Management Studies. 1992 Mar 31;29(2):195-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00660.x

Author

Ingham, Hilary ; Kran, Ingvild ; Lovestam, Andre. / MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY : A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY?. In: Journal of Management Studies. 1992 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 195-208.

Bibtex

@article{6b20e579b92e48e38950fc41ca5b5b64,
title = "MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY: A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY?",
abstract = "Since 1983 expenditure on acquisitions in the UK has more than doubled in real terms, despite the fact that the consensus of opinion in the academic literature is that acquisitions are not, on average, performance enhancing for the acquiring firm. Such literature, however, relates mainly to the acquisition of large, public companies. Drawing on survey evidence from 146 of the UK's top 500 companies, this article reports the results from a survey which encompasses all takeovers. The study revealed that is the expected reward of increased profitabililty which is used in ex‐post evaluation. The major finding of the study is, however, that managers firmly perceive that their takeover activity has been performance enhancing for their company. The evidence presented does suggest that the integration of small acquisitions into an existing organizational structure may be achieved without severe problems of loss of control, and the subsequent decline in performance which beset large acquisitions",
author = "Hilary Ingham and Ingvild Kran and Andre Lovestam",
year = "1992",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00660.x",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "195--208",
journal = "Journal of Management Studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - MERGERS AND PROFITABILITY

T2 - A MANAGERIAL SUCCESS STORY?

AU - Ingham, Hilary

AU - Kran, Ingvild

AU - Lovestam, Andre

PY - 1992/3/31

Y1 - 1992/3/31

N2 - Since 1983 expenditure on acquisitions in the UK has more than doubled in real terms, despite the fact that the consensus of opinion in the academic literature is that acquisitions are not, on average, performance enhancing for the acquiring firm. Such literature, however, relates mainly to the acquisition of large, public companies. Drawing on survey evidence from 146 of the UK's top 500 companies, this article reports the results from a survey which encompasses all takeovers. The study revealed that is the expected reward of increased profitabililty which is used in ex‐post evaluation. The major finding of the study is, however, that managers firmly perceive that their takeover activity has been performance enhancing for their company. The evidence presented does suggest that the integration of small acquisitions into an existing organizational structure may be achieved without severe problems of loss of control, and the subsequent decline in performance which beset large acquisitions

AB - Since 1983 expenditure on acquisitions in the UK has more than doubled in real terms, despite the fact that the consensus of opinion in the academic literature is that acquisitions are not, on average, performance enhancing for the acquiring firm. Such literature, however, relates mainly to the acquisition of large, public companies. Drawing on survey evidence from 146 of the UK's top 500 companies, this article reports the results from a survey which encompasses all takeovers. The study revealed that is the expected reward of increased profitabililty which is used in ex‐post evaluation. The major finding of the study is, however, that managers firmly perceive that their takeover activity has been performance enhancing for their company. The evidence presented does suggest that the integration of small acquisitions into an existing organizational structure may be achieved without severe problems of loss of control, and the subsequent decline in performance which beset large acquisitions

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00660.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00660.x

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84889960601

VL - 29

SP - 195

EP - 208

JO - Journal of Management Studies

JF - Journal of Management Studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 2

ER -