Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mesoclosures

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mesoclosures: increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Mesoclosures : increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning. / Lähteenmäki, Saija; Slade, Eleanor M.; Hardwick, Bess; Schiffler, Gustavo; Louzada, Julio; Barlow, Jos; Roslin, Tomas.

In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 6, No. 8, 08.2015, p. 916-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Lähteenmäki, S, Slade, EM, Hardwick, B, Schiffler, G, Louzada, J, Barlow, J & Roslin, T 2015, 'Mesoclosures: increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning', Methods in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 916-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12367

APA

Lähteenmäki, S., Slade, E. M., Hardwick, B., Schiffler, G., Louzada, J., Barlow, J., & Roslin, T. (2015). Mesoclosures: increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(8), 916-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12367

Vancouver

Lähteenmäki S, Slade EM, Hardwick B, Schiffler G, Louzada J, Barlow J et al. Mesoclosures: increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015 Aug;6(8):916-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12367

Author

Lähteenmäki, Saija ; Slade, Eleanor M. ; Hardwick, Bess ; Schiffler, Gustavo ; Louzada, Julio ; Barlow, Jos ; Roslin, Tomas. / Mesoclosures : increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning. In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015 ; Vol. 6, No. 8. pp. 916-924.

Bibtex

@article{1c6c74d3313d46cc85952d287c67bde0,
title = "Mesoclosures: increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning",
abstract = "Summary1.Experimental studies linking community composition to functioning are typically confined to small and closed micro- or mesocosms. Such restricted conditions may affect both species{\textquoteright} biology and their environment. Yet, targeting simple features in the behaviour of species may circumvent these constraints. Focusing on ecological functions provided by dung beetles, we test whether large, open-top cages – MESOCLOSURES – will intercept the flight trajectories of beetles, thereby allowing manipulation of local community composition.2.MESOCLOSURES were built in both tropical forest (Brazil) and temperate grasslands (Finland), thus testing their general efficiency. Within the respective environments, we varied different aspects of MESOCLOSURE design: in the tropical forest, we examined the impact of MESOCLOSURE dimensions on exclusion efficiency, whereas in the temperate grassland, we assessed the potential for selectively excluding and including community members by different mesh sizes. In the temperate environment, we also went from method to application, using MESOCLOSURES to relate community composition to functioning under two simulated grazing regimes.3.MESOCLOSURES allowed efficient manipulation of dung beetle communities, maintaining dung beetle densities at intended levels in both temperate and tropical systems. In the tropics, the smallest cages (1 × 1 m) offered the highest contrast in beetle densities inside vs. outside of the fence, whereas the largest cages (9 × 9 m) offered the lowest. Nonetheless, densities inside cages never exceed one-fifth of those outside. At the temperate site, manipulations of community structure through mesh size yielded significant differences in functioning and suggested an interaction between small dung-dwelling species and large tunnelling species. Within cages, higher grazing was reflected in augmented dung removal.4.We conclude that MESOCLOSURES can be effectively used to study dung beetle functions across habitats and latitudes. As applied insights, the present study adds resolution to the significance of different functional groups of dung beetles and shows that grazing pressure may have an important impact on the ecosystem functions that they provide. Overall, this study suggests that targeted manipulation of dispersal may offer new solutions for linking fauna to ecosystem functions with minimal impact on the processes measured.",
keywords = "Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning, dung beetles, ecosystem services, enclosures, experimental manipulations, functional groups, grazing pressure, mesocosms, DUNG BEETLE DIVERSITY, MICROCOSM EXPERIMENTS, LIMITED RELEVANCE, TROPICAL FOREST, COMMUNITY, ECOLOGY, BIODIVERSITY, FIELD, FRAGMENTATION, SUPPRESSION",
author = "Saija L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki and Slade, {Eleanor M.} and Bess Hardwick and Gustavo Schiffler and Julio Louzada and Jos Barlow and Tomas Roslin",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/2041-210X.12367",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "916--924",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mesoclosures

T2 - increasing realism in mesocosm studies of ecosystem functioning

AU - Lähteenmäki, Saija

AU - Slade, Eleanor M.

AU - Hardwick, Bess

AU - Schiffler, Gustavo

AU - Louzada, Julio

AU - Barlow, Jos

AU - Roslin, Tomas

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - Summary1.Experimental studies linking community composition to functioning are typically confined to small and closed micro- or mesocosms. Such restricted conditions may affect both species’ biology and their environment. Yet, targeting simple features in the behaviour of species may circumvent these constraints. Focusing on ecological functions provided by dung beetles, we test whether large, open-top cages – MESOCLOSURES – will intercept the flight trajectories of beetles, thereby allowing manipulation of local community composition.2.MESOCLOSURES were built in both tropical forest (Brazil) and temperate grasslands (Finland), thus testing their general efficiency. Within the respective environments, we varied different aspects of MESOCLOSURE design: in the tropical forest, we examined the impact of MESOCLOSURE dimensions on exclusion efficiency, whereas in the temperate grassland, we assessed the potential for selectively excluding and including community members by different mesh sizes. In the temperate environment, we also went from method to application, using MESOCLOSURES to relate community composition to functioning under two simulated grazing regimes.3.MESOCLOSURES allowed efficient manipulation of dung beetle communities, maintaining dung beetle densities at intended levels in both temperate and tropical systems. In the tropics, the smallest cages (1 × 1 m) offered the highest contrast in beetle densities inside vs. outside of the fence, whereas the largest cages (9 × 9 m) offered the lowest. Nonetheless, densities inside cages never exceed one-fifth of those outside. At the temperate site, manipulations of community structure through mesh size yielded significant differences in functioning and suggested an interaction between small dung-dwelling species and large tunnelling species. Within cages, higher grazing was reflected in augmented dung removal.4.We conclude that MESOCLOSURES can be effectively used to study dung beetle functions across habitats and latitudes. As applied insights, the present study adds resolution to the significance of different functional groups of dung beetles and shows that grazing pressure may have an important impact on the ecosystem functions that they provide. Overall, this study suggests that targeted manipulation of dispersal may offer new solutions for linking fauna to ecosystem functions with minimal impact on the processes measured.

AB - Summary1.Experimental studies linking community composition to functioning are typically confined to small and closed micro- or mesocosms. Such restricted conditions may affect both species’ biology and their environment. Yet, targeting simple features in the behaviour of species may circumvent these constraints. Focusing on ecological functions provided by dung beetles, we test whether large, open-top cages – MESOCLOSURES – will intercept the flight trajectories of beetles, thereby allowing manipulation of local community composition.2.MESOCLOSURES were built in both tropical forest (Brazil) and temperate grasslands (Finland), thus testing their general efficiency. Within the respective environments, we varied different aspects of MESOCLOSURE design: in the tropical forest, we examined the impact of MESOCLOSURE dimensions on exclusion efficiency, whereas in the temperate grassland, we assessed the potential for selectively excluding and including community members by different mesh sizes. In the temperate environment, we also went from method to application, using MESOCLOSURES to relate community composition to functioning under two simulated grazing regimes.3.MESOCLOSURES allowed efficient manipulation of dung beetle communities, maintaining dung beetle densities at intended levels in both temperate and tropical systems. In the tropics, the smallest cages (1 × 1 m) offered the highest contrast in beetle densities inside vs. outside of the fence, whereas the largest cages (9 × 9 m) offered the lowest. Nonetheless, densities inside cages never exceed one-fifth of those outside. At the temperate site, manipulations of community structure through mesh size yielded significant differences in functioning and suggested an interaction between small dung-dwelling species and large tunnelling species. Within cages, higher grazing was reflected in augmented dung removal.4.We conclude that MESOCLOSURES can be effectively used to study dung beetle functions across habitats and latitudes. As applied insights, the present study adds resolution to the significance of different functional groups of dung beetles and shows that grazing pressure may have an important impact on the ecosystem functions that they provide. Overall, this study suggests that targeted manipulation of dispersal may offer new solutions for linking fauna to ecosystem functions with minimal impact on the processes measured.

KW - Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning

KW - dung beetles

KW - ecosystem services

KW - enclosures

KW - experimental manipulations

KW - functional groups

KW - grazing pressure

KW - mesocosms

KW - DUNG BEETLE DIVERSITY

KW - MICROCOSM EXPERIMENTS

KW - LIMITED RELEVANCE

KW - TROPICAL FOREST

KW - COMMUNITY

KW - ECOLOGY

KW - BIODIVERSITY

KW - FIELD

KW - FRAGMENTATION

KW - SUPPRESSION

U2 - 10.1111/2041-210X.12367

DO - 10.1111/2041-210X.12367

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 916

EP - 924

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 8

ER -