Final published version, 1.58 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis
Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis
}
TY - BOOK
T1 - Metacognition and dyslexia
T2 - towards an increased understanding of the cognitive knowledge and self-regulation practices of students with dyslexia in higher education
AU - Foster, Irene
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This thesis examines the metacognitive and self-regulatory practices of students with dyslexia in higher education. It focuses on the understanding that these students have of their learning, the strategies they use and factors that determine how and why strategies are used. The study further examines the planning, organisation, management and evaluation of their learning.From an insider-researcher perspective, the data collection is derived from 16 semistructured interviews and a self-administered inventory, situated within an independent UK university. The participants were enrolled on the full time or part time route of the same training programme at the host university. A mixed methods approach was considered to lend itself to providing qualitative in-depth lived experience data and perceptions based on a 52 statement inventory of knowledge and regulation of cognition.The study findings suggest metacognition and self-regulation practices of these dyslexic students in higher education to be inefficient rather than deficient. Importantly, it notes the timeliness and impact of training input and learning support intervention on such findings.
AB - This thesis examines the metacognitive and self-regulatory practices of students with dyslexia in higher education. It focuses on the understanding that these students have of their learning, the strategies they use and factors that determine how and why strategies are used. The study further examines the planning, organisation, management and evaluation of their learning.From an insider-researcher perspective, the data collection is derived from 16 semistructured interviews and a self-administered inventory, situated within an independent UK university. The participants were enrolled on the full time or part time route of the same training programme at the host university. A mixed methods approach was considered to lend itself to providing qualitative in-depth lived experience data and perceptions based on a 52 statement inventory of knowledge and regulation of cognition.The study findings suggest metacognition and self-regulation practices of these dyslexic students in higher education to be inefficient rather than deficient. Importantly, it notes the timeliness and impact of training input and learning support intervention on such findings.
KW - Dyslexia
KW - specific learning difficulties
KW - specific learning disability
KW - Metacognition
KW - Self-regulation
KW - mixed methods approach
KW - Higher Education
U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/121
DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/121
M3 - Doctoral Thesis
PB - Lancaster University
ER -