Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Metaphors for 'good' and 'bad' deaths

Electronic data


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Metaphors for 'good' and 'bad' deaths: a health professional view

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>05/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Metaphor and the Social World
Issue number1
Number of pages19
Pages (from-to)1-19
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date5/01/16
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This paper discusses the metaphors used by sixteen palliative healthcare professionals from around the United Kingdom in semi-structured interviews to describe what they see as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deaths. The interviews, conducted for the large-scale Metaphor in End-of-Life Care project, are set against the background of contemporary practices and discourses around end-of-life care, dying and quality of death.

To date, the use of metaphor in descriptions of different types of deaths has not received much attention. Applying the Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglejaz Group, 2007) we find that the difference between good and bad deaths is partly expressed via different frequencies of contrasting metaphors, such as ‘peacefulness’ and ‘openness’ as opposed to ‘struggle’ and ‘pushing away’ professional help. We show how metaphors are used to: evaluate deaths and the dying; justify those evaluations; present a remarkably consistent view of different types of deaths; and promote a particular ‘framing’ of a good death, which is closely linked with the dominant sociocultural and professional contexts of our interviewees. We discuss the implications of these consistent evaluations and framings in broader end-of-life care contexts, and reflect on the significance of our findings for the role of metaphor in communication about sensitive experiences.

Bibliographic note

Gold open access