Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Methodological issues in economic evaluations o...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries. / Lilford, R.; Nepogodiev, D.; Chilton, P.J. et al.
In: BMJ Global Health, Vol. 6, No. 3, e004723, 18.03.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Lilford, R, Nepogodiev, D, Chilton, PJ, Watson, SI, Erlangga, D, Diggle, P, Girling, AJ & Sculpher, M 2021, 'Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries', BMJ Global Health, vol. 6, no. 3, e004723. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004723

APA

Lilford, R., Nepogodiev, D., Chilton, P. J., Watson, S. I., Erlangga, D., Diggle, P., Girling, A. J., & Sculpher, M. (2021). Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 6(3), Article e004723. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004723

Vancouver

Lilford R, Nepogodiev D, Chilton PJ, Watson SI, Erlangga D, Diggle P et al. Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health. 2021 Mar 18;6(3):e004723. Epub 2021 Mar 18. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004723

Author

Lilford, R. ; Nepogodiev, D. ; Chilton, P.J. et al. / Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries. In: BMJ Global Health. 2021 ; Vol. 6, No. 3.

Bibtex

@article{43d3ea83db0c43da90f0391467905989,
title = "Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries",
abstract = "A recent systematic review identified few papers on the economic evaluation of systems for emergency transport of acutely ill or injured patients. In addition, we found no articles dealing with the methodological challenges posed by such studies in low-income or middle-income countries. We therefore carried out an analysis of issues that are of particular salience to this important topic. This is an intellectual study in which we develop models, identify their limitations, suggest potential extensions to the models and discuss priorities for empirical studies to populate models. First, we develop a general model to calculate changes in survival contingent on the reduced time to treatment that an emergency transport system is designed to achieve. Second, we develop a model to estimate transfer times over an area that will be served by a proposed transfer system. Third, we discuss difficulties in obtaining parameters with which to populate the models. Fourth, we discuss costs, both direct and indirect, of an emergency transfer service. Fifth, we discuss the issue that outcomes other than survival should be considered and that the effects of a service are a weighted sum over all the conditions and severities for which the service caters. Lastly, based on the above work, we identify priorities for research. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify and frame issues in the health economics of acute transfer systems and to develop models to calculate survival rates from basic parameters, such as time delay/survival relationships, that vary by intervention type and context. {\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.",
keywords = "Health economics, controlled study, economic evaluation, empiricism, human, lowest income group, middle income country, review, survival rate, time to treatment",
author = "R. Lilford and D. Nepogodiev and P.J. Chilton and S.I. Watson and D. Erlangga and P. Diggle and A.J. Girling and M. Sculpher",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004723",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMJ Global Health",
issn = "2059-7908",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological issues in economic evaluations of emergency transport systems in low-income and middle-income countries

AU - Lilford, R.

AU - Nepogodiev, D.

AU - Chilton, P.J.

AU - Watson, S.I.

AU - Erlangga, D.

AU - Diggle, P.

AU - Girling, A.J.

AU - Sculpher, M.

PY - 2021/3/18

Y1 - 2021/3/18

N2 - A recent systematic review identified few papers on the economic evaluation of systems for emergency transport of acutely ill or injured patients. In addition, we found no articles dealing with the methodological challenges posed by such studies in low-income or middle-income countries. We therefore carried out an analysis of issues that are of particular salience to this important topic. This is an intellectual study in which we develop models, identify their limitations, suggest potential extensions to the models and discuss priorities for empirical studies to populate models. First, we develop a general model to calculate changes in survival contingent on the reduced time to treatment that an emergency transport system is designed to achieve. Second, we develop a model to estimate transfer times over an area that will be served by a proposed transfer system. Third, we discuss difficulties in obtaining parameters with which to populate the models. Fourth, we discuss costs, both direct and indirect, of an emergency transfer service. Fifth, we discuss the issue that outcomes other than survival should be considered and that the effects of a service are a weighted sum over all the conditions and severities for which the service caters. Lastly, based on the above work, we identify priorities for research. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify and frame issues in the health economics of acute transfer systems and to develop models to calculate survival rates from basic parameters, such as time delay/survival relationships, that vary by intervention type and context. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

AB - A recent systematic review identified few papers on the economic evaluation of systems for emergency transport of acutely ill or injured patients. In addition, we found no articles dealing with the methodological challenges posed by such studies in low-income or middle-income countries. We therefore carried out an analysis of issues that are of particular salience to this important topic. This is an intellectual study in which we develop models, identify their limitations, suggest potential extensions to the models and discuss priorities for empirical studies to populate models. First, we develop a general model to calculate changes in survival contingent on the reduced time to treatment that an emergency transport system is designed to achieve. Second, we develop a model to estimate transfer times over an area that will be served by a proposed transfer system. Third, we discuss difficulties in obtaining parameters with which to populate the models. Fourth, we discuss costs, both direct and indirect, of an emergency transfer service. Fifth, we discuss the issue that outcomes other than survival should be considered and that the effects of a service are a weighted sum over all the conditions and severities for which the service caters. Lastly, based on the above work, we identify priorities for research. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify and frame issues in the health economics of acute transfer systems and to develop models to calculate survival rates from basic parameters, such as time delay/survival relationships, that vary by intervention type and context. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

KW - Health economics

KW - controlled study

KW - economic evaluation

KW - empiricism

KW - human

KW - lowest income group

KW - middle income country

KW - review

KW - survival rate

KW - time to treatment

U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004723

DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004723

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

JO - BMJ Global Health

JF - BMJ Global Health

SN - 2059-7908

IS - 3

M1 - e004723

ER -