Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Metropolitan railways

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Metropolitan railways: urban form and the public benefit in London and Paris c.1850-1880

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Metropolitan railways: urban form and the public benefit in London and Paris c.1850-1880. / Lopez-Galviz, Carlos Andres.
In: The London Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2013, p. 184-202.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lopez-Galviz CA. Metropolitan railways: urban form and the public benefit in London and Paris c.1850-1880. The London Journal. 2013;38(3):184-202. doi: 10.1179/0305803413Z.00000000030

Author

Bibtex

@article{c7211e9ba56c40c98f76ac728f2f56bc,
title = "Metropolitan railways: urban form and the public benefit in London and Paris c.1850-1880",
abstract = "When the first section of the Metropolitan Railway opened in January 1863 in London, debates in Parliament emphasized the need to conceive of railways as a system of interconnected circles instead of the lines and termini that had been built since the 1830s. Similar debates took place in Paris around this time, although no plan was implemented before the opening of the M{\'e}tropolitain{\textquoteright}s first line in 1900. The use of geometric terms such as rings, circuits and circles proliferated throughout the process, illustrating new ways of connecting the railways, and, more importantly, embryonic ideas about how the two cities could use transport technologies for shaping their own growth. Doing so was dependent on how, where and why the notion of the public benefit was articulated. Railways encapsulated both constraints and possibilities for the transformation, real and imagined, that the two metropolises were to experience.",
keywords = "London, Metropolitan, Paris, Public Benefit, Railways",
author = "Lopez-Galviz, {Carlos Andres}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1179/0305803413Z.00000000030",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "184--202",
journal = "The London Journal",
issn = "0305-8034",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metropolitan railways

T2 - urban form and the public benefit in London and Paris c.1850-1880

AU - Lopez-Galviz, Carlos Andres

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - When the first section of the Metropolitan Railway opened in January 1863 in London, debates in Parliament emphasized the need to conceive of railways as a system of interconnected circles instead of the lines and termini that had been built since the 1830s. Similar debates took place in Paris around this time, although no plan was implemented before the opening of the Métropolitain’s first line in 1900. The use of geometric terms such as rings, circuits and circles proliferated throughout the process, illustrating new ways of connecting the railways, and, more importantly, embryonic ideas about how the two cities could use transport technologies for shaping their own growth. Doing so was dependent on how, where and why the notion of the public benefit was articulated. Railways encapsulated both constraints and possibilities for the transformation, real and imagined, that the two metropolises were to experience.

AB - When the first section of the Metropolitan Railway opened in January 1863 in London, debates in Parliament emphasized the need to conceive of railways as a system of interconnected circles instead of the lines and termini that had been built since the 1830s. Similar debates took place in Paris around this time, although no plan was implemented before the opening of the Métropolitain’s first line in 1900. The use of geometric terms such as rings, circuits and circles proliferated throughout the process, illustrating new ways of connecting the railways, and, more importantly, embryonic ideas about how the two cities could use transport technologies for shaping their own growth. Doing so was dependent on how, where and why the notion of the public benefit was articulated. Railways encapsulated both constraints and possibilities for the transformation, real and imagined, that the two metropolises were to experience.

KW - London

KW - Metropolitan

KW - Paris

KW - Public Benefit

KW - Railways

U2 - 10.1179/0305803413Z.00000000030

DO - 10.1179/0305803413Z.00000000030

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 184

EP - 202

JO - The London Journal

JF - The London Journal

SN - 0305-8034

IS - 3

ER -