Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Migrant women and social reproduction under aus...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Migrant women and social reproduction under austerity

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Migrant women and social reproduction under austerity. / Lonergan, Gwyneth.
In: Feminist Review, Vol. 109, No. 1, 2015, p. 124-145.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lonergan G. Migrant women and social reproduction under austerity. Feminist Review. 2015;109(1):124-145. doi: 10.1057/fr.2014.43

Author

Lonergan, Gwyneth. / Migrant women and social reproduction under austerity. In: Feminist Review. 2015 ; Vol. 109, No. 1. pp. 124-145.

Bibtex

@article{1688375f827741979d55e90de4ae2fd1,
title = "Migrant women and social reproduction under austerity",
abstract = "Since coming to power in 2010, the UK Coalition government has enacted a series of cuts to public spending, under the auspices of austerity. Underpinning these cuts is a neo-liberal model of citizenship, in which citizens are expected to be autonomous, independent and economically productive, and in which the responsibilities of citizenship outweigh the rights. This model of citizenship is characterised by a paradoxical approach to social reproduction. The Coalition government has taken a significant interest in social reproduction as a means of creating the next generation of {\textquoteleft}good{\textquoteright} neo-liberal citizens; yet, the current austerity measures involve the withdrawal of state support for social reproduction activities. Drawing on participant observation carried out with migrant women{\textquoteright}s groups in Sheffield and Manchester, as well as interviews with group members, this article demonstrates how the government{\textquoteright}s paradoxical approach to social reproduction, combined with gendered and racialised discourses of citizenship and {\textquoteleft}Britishness{\textquoteright}, have led to policies that place ethnic minority migrant women in an untenable situation. The social reproduction activities of ethnic minority migrant women are the subject of intense government interest, because of the concern that they will be unable to produce {\textquoteleft}good{\textquoteright} neo-liberal citizens. In some cases, this has led to government policies clearly intended to dissuade {\textquoteleft}undesirable{\textquoteright} migrants from having children. In other cases, migrant women are expected to show their commitment to integration, both for themselves and their children, specifically by learning English, even as the government has drastically cut funding for English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) classes. While seemingly paradoxical, this is in keeping with a racialised neo-liberal model of citizenship under which the {\textquoteleft}responsible{\textquoteright} migrant mother should be able to parent and learn English without government assistance. Nonetheless, these policies are actually self-defeating, as they prevent migrant women from exhibiting the very characteristics of neo-liberal citizenship that they are ostensibly trying to encourage.",
keywords = "austerity, migration, social reproduction, citizenship, neoliberalism, gender",
author = "Gwyneth Lonergan",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1057/fr.2014.43",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "124--145",
journal = "Feminist Review",
issn = "0141-7789",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Migrant women and social reproduction under austerity

AU - Lonergan, Gwyneth

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Since coming to power in 2010, the UK Coalition government has enacted a series of cuts to public spending, under the auspices of austerity. Underpinning these cuts is a neo-liberal model of citizenship, in which citizens are expected to be autonomous, independent and economically productive, and in which the responsibilities of citizenship outweigh the rights. This model of citizenship is characterised by a paradoxical approach to social reproduction. The Coalition government has taken a significant interest in social reproduction as a means of creating the next generation of ‘good’ neo-liberal citizens; yet, the current austerity measures involve the withdrawal of state support for social reproduction activities. Drawing on participant observation carried out with migrant women’s groups in Sheffield and Manchester, as well as interviews with group members, this article demonstrates how the government’s paradoxical approach to social reproduction, combined with gendered and racialised discourses of citizenship and ‘Britishness’, have led to policies that place ethnic minority migrant women in an untenable situation. The social reproduction activities of ethnic minority migrant women are the subject of intense government interest, because of the concern that they will be unable to produce ‘good’ neo-liberal citizens. In some cases, this has led to government policies clearly intended to dissuade ‘undesirable’ migrants from having children. In other cases, migrant women are expected to show their commitment to integration, both for themselves and their children, specifically by learning English, even as the government has drastically cut funding for English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) classes. While seemingly paradoxical, this is in keeping with a racialised neo-liberal model of citizenship under which the ‘responsible’ migrant mother should be able to parent and learn English without government assistance. Nonetheless, these policies are actually self-defeating, as they prevent migrant women from exhibiting the very characteristics of neo-liberal citizenship that they are ostensibly trying to encourage.

AB - Since coming to power in 2010, the UK Coalition government has enacted a series of cuts to public spending, under the auspices of austerity. Underpinning these cuts is a neo-liberal model of citizenship, in which citizens are expected to be autonomous, independent and economically productive, and in which the responsibilities of citizenship outweigh the rights. This model of citizenship is characterised by a paradoxical approach to social reproduction. The Coalition government has taken a significant interest in social reproduction as a means of creating the next generation of ‘good’ neo-liberal citizens; yet, the current austerity measures involve the withdrawal of state support for social reproduction activities. Drawing on participant observation carried out with migrant women’s groups in Sheffield and Manchester, as well as interviews with group members, this article demonstrates how the government’s paradoxical approach to social reproduction, combined with gendered and racialised discourses of citizenship and ‘Britishness’, have led to policies that place ethnic minority migrant women in an untenable situation. The social reproduction activities of ethnic minority migrant women are the subject of intense government interest, because of the concern that they will be unable to produce ‘good’ neo-liberal citizens. In some cases, this has led to government policies clearly intended to dissuade ‘undesirable’ migrants from having children. In other cases, migrant women are expected to show their commitment to integration, both for themselves and their children, specifically by learning English, even as the government has drastically cut funding for English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) classes. While seemingly paradoxical, this is in keeping with a racialised neo-liberal model of citizenship under which the ‘responsible’ migrant mother should be able to parent and learn English without government assistance. Nonetheless, these policies are actually self-defeating, as they prevent migrant women from exhibiting the very characteristics of neo-liberal citizenship that they are ostensibly trying to encourage.

KW - austerity

KW - migration

KW - social reproduction

KW - citizenship

KW - neoliberalism

KW - gender

U2 - 10.1057/fr.2014.43

DO - 10.1057/fr.2014.43

M3 - Journal article

VL - 109

SP - 124

EP - 145

JO - Feminist Review

JF - Feminist Review

SN - 0141-7789

IS - 1

ER -