Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Militant, annoying and sexy

Electronic data

  • Militant annoying sexy_accepted

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Discourse Studies on 29/03/2022, available online:  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17405904.2022.2055592

    Accepted author manuscript, 371 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 29/09/23

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Militant, annoying and sexy: A corpus-based study of representations of vegans in the British press

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>29/03/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Critical Discourse Studies
Number of pages19
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date29/03/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This article examines discourse representations of vegans in UK newspapers, comparing broadsheets with tabloids published between 2016 and 2020. Taking a corpus-based approach to CDA, we identify a series of discourses, some of which overlap between the broadsheets and tabloids while others are particular to one format or the other. Vegans tend to be evaluated negatively in this context, portrayed as violent, hypocritical, pushy and irresponsible when it comes to their (and their children’s) health. Such representations are characteristic of the tabloids in particular, whereas broadsheets provide more balanced coverage, with a greater propensity to present counter-discourses and to provide page space to airing the first-hand perspectives of vegans themselves. In the paper, we make recommendations as to how coverage can achieve better balance, to the benefit of the vegan movement and – by extension – the wellbeing of humans, other animals, and the environment.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Discourse Studies on 29/03/2022, available online:  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17405904.2022.2055592