Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mind the gap

Electronic data

  • 61.3.brewster

    Rights statement: Copyright © 2013 The Johns Hopkins University Press. This article first appeared in Library Trends, 61, 3, 2013 pages 569-586.

    Final published version, 311 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: None

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mind the gap: do librarians understand service user perspectives on bibliotherapy?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Mind the gap: do librarians understand service user perspectives on bibliotherapy? / Brewster, Liz; Sen, Barbara; Cox, Andrew.
In: Library Trends, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2013, p. 569-586.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brewster L, Sen B, Cox A. Mind the gap: do librarians understand service user perspectives on bibliotherapy? Library Trends. 2013;61(3):569-586. doi: 10.1353/lib.2013.0001

Author

Brewster, Liz ; Sen, Barbara ; Cox, Andrew. / Mind the gap : do librarians understand service user perspectives on bibliotherapy?. In: Library Trends. 2013 ; Vol. 61, No. 3. pp. 569-586.

Bibtex

@article{fc8436ed46694641a8685ea803236179,
title = "Mind the gap: do librarians understand service user perspectives on bibliotherapy?",
abstract = "Bibliotherapy schemes aim to improve mental health and well-being. Schemes focus on engagement with either imaginative literature or self-help texts and are now commonplace in U.K. public libraries. Impetus for bibliotherapy schemes was influenced by health policy and a drive toward partnership working. There is a recognized need for in-depth evaluation of bibliotherapy services; the lack of evaluation is problematic, as the schemes are designed without reference to service user perspectives. There is a need to identify and analyze usage to assess effectiveness of the schemes. Drawing on data from interviews and focus groups with library and health professionals and service users, this article explores the service provider and service user perspective on bibliotherapy schemes. It concludes that-for service providers-there is a lack of clarity and understanding about how bibliotherapy works, and this impacts on the experience of service users. While service providers and service users share a common goal of improving mental health and well-being, their understandings of bibliotherapy differ, meaning there is a potential gap between service provision and service user needs. The article concludes that in-depth research influenced by user-centered design principles, may help to improve services in practice.",
author = "Liz Brewster and Barbara Sen and Andrew Cox",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2013 The Johns Hopkins University Press. This article first appeared in Library Trends, 61, 3, 2013 pages 569-586.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1353/lib.2013.0001",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "569--586",
journal = "Library Trends",
issn = "0024-2594",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mind the gap

T2 - do librarians understand service user perspectives on bibliotherapy?

AU - Brewster, Liz

AU - Sen, Barbara

AU - Cox, Andrew

N1 - Copyright © 2013 The Johns Hopkins University Press. This article first appeared in Library Trends, 61, 3, 2013 pages 569-586.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Bibliotherapy schemes aim to improve mental health and well-being. Schemes focus on engagement with either imaginative literature or self-help texts and are now commonplace in U.K. public libraries. Impetus for bibliotherapy schemes was influenced by health policy and a drive toward partnership working. There is a recognized need for in-depth evaluation of bibliotherapy services; the lack of evaluation is problematic, as the schemes are designed without reference to service user perspectives. There is a need to identify and analyze usage to assess effectiveness of the schemes. Drawing on data from interviews and focus groups with library and health professionals and service users, this article explores the service provider and service user perspective on bibliotherapy schemes. It concludes that-for service providers-there is a lack of clarity and understanding about how bibliotherapy works, and this impacts on the experience of service users. While service providers and service users share a common goal of improving mental health and well-being, their understandings of bibliotherapy differ, meaning there is a potential gap between service provision and service user needs. The article concludes that in-depth research influenced by user-centered design principles, may help to improve services in practice.

AB - Bibliotherapy schemes aim to improve mental health and well-being. Schemes focus on engagement with either imaginative literature or self-help texts and are now commonplace in U.K. public libraries. Impetus for bibliotherapy schemes was influenced by health policy and a drive toward partnership working. There is a recognized need for in-depth evaluation of bibliotherapy services; the lack of evaluation is problematic, as the schemes are designed without reference to service user perspectives. There is a need to identify and analyze usage to assess effectiveness of the schemes. Drawing on data from interviews and focus groups with library and health professionals and service users, this article explores the service provider and service user perspective on bibliotherapy schemes. It concludes that-for service providers-there is a lack of clarity and understanding about how bibliotherapy works, and this impacts on the experience of service users. While service providers and service users share a common goal of improving mental health and well-being, their understandings of bibliotherapy differ, meaning there is a potential gap between service provision and service user needs. The article concludes that in-depth research influenced by user-centered design principles, may help to improve services in practice.

U2 - 10.1353/lib.2013.0001

DO - 10.1353/lib.2013.0001

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84878432649

VL - 61

SP - 569

EP - 586

JO - Library Trends

JF - Library Trends

SN - 0024-2594

IS - 3

ER -