352 KB, PDF document
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Mitigation and current management attempts to limit pathogen survival and movement within farmed grassland.
AU - Oliver, David M.
AU - Heathwaite, A. L.
AU - Hodgson, Chris J.
AU - Chadwick, David R.
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Advances in Agronomy 93 (1), 2007, © ELSEVIER.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - To successfully curb microbial contamination of surface waters we need to understand, and holistically evaluate, the range of mitigation strategies that have been designed to protect watercourses from non-point agricultural sources, so as to use them to best effect. A cost-effective and pragmatic approach is to improve knowledge of farm management operations capable of (i) reducing potential pathogen numbers in livestock manures and (ii) reducing subsequent transfer (through the environment) of fecal micro-organisms derived from livestock manures that are recycled to land. This will prove important for supporting farmer decision making, devising policy and implementing mitigation practices to limit fecal micro-organism delivery from land to water. In this chapter, we consider a diverse suite of manure, animal and land management options that range from simple manure composting techniques and the use of slurry additives, through to land management engineering approaches and the design of constructed wetlands to protect watercourses from microbial contamination. The choice as to which strategy to use, if any, is ultimately made by the farmer and is likely to be influenced by a complex range of factors which may include, for example, tradition, convenience and farm economics. We conclude that the inherent complexity associated with heterogeneous landscapes confounds the likelihood that a single management strategy will provide complete protection of receiving waters from microbial contamination. Instead, the coupling of different strategies alongside improved education and considerable vigilance by farmers and land-owners is needed for a more sustainable approach to limiting diffuse microbial (and, crucially, other contaminant) pollution from agriculture.
AB - To successfully curb microbial contamination of surface waters we need to understand, and holistically evaluate, the range of mitigation strategies that have been designed to protect watercourses from non-point agricultural sources, so as to use them to best effect. A cost-effective and pragmatic approach is to improve knowledge of farm management operations capable of (i) reducing potential pathogen numbers in livestock manures and (ii) reducing subsequent transfer (through the environment) of fecal micro-organisms derived from livestock manures that are recycled to land. This will prove important for supporting farmer decision making, devising policy and implementing mitigation practices to limit fecal micro-organism delivery from land to water. In this chapter, we consider a diverse suite of manure, animal and land management options that range from simple manure composting techniques and the use of slurry additives, through to land management engineering approaches and the design of constructed wetlands to protect watercourses from microbial contamination. The choice as to which strategy to use, if any, is ultimately made by the farmer and is likely to be influenced by a complex range of factors which may include, for example, tradition, convenience and farm economics. We conclude that the inherent complexity associated with heterogeneous landscapes confounds the likelihood that a single management strategy will provide complete protection of receiving waters from microbial contamination. Instead, the coupling of different strategies alongside improved education and considerable vigilance by farmers and land-owners is needed for a more sustainable approach to limiting diffuse microbial (and, crucially, other contaminant) pollution from agriculture.
KW - agriculture
KW - animal manure
KW - non-point source pollution
KW - diffuse pollution
KW - land management
KW - livestock grazing manure management
KW - mitigation
KW - pathogens
KW - source
KW - transfer
KW - die-off
KW - faeces
U2 - 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93003-X
DO - 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93003-X
M3 - Journal article
VL - 93
SP - 95
EP - 152
JO - Advances in Agronomy
JF - Advances in Agronomy
SN - 0065-2113
IS - 1
ER -