Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of solar radiation management

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of solar radiation management. / McLaren, Duncan.
In: Earth's Future, Vol. 4, No. 12, 12.2016, p. 596-602.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

McLaren, D 2016, 'Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of solar radiation management', Earth's Future, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 596-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000445

APA

McLaren, D. (2016). Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of solar radiation management. Earth's Future, 4(12), 596-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000445

Vancouver

McLaren D. Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of solar radiation management. Earth's Future. 2016 Dec;4(12):596-602. Epub 2016 Dec 20. doi: 10.1002/2016EF000445

Author

McLaren, Duncan. / Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of solar radiation management. In: Earth's Future. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 12. pp. 596-602.

Bibtex

@article{f7ff5ac9fb2d46f38fe26604160c3c98,
title = "Mitigation deterrence and the {"}moral hazard{"} of solar radiation management",
abstract = "Fears of a moral hazard effect deterring mitigation have dogged solar radiation management (SRM) research since before 2006. Researchers have debated the significance and relevance of this concern from multiple disciplines and perspectives. This article explores this debate, highlighting the significance of policy goals and the actual and perceived substitutability of SRM for mitigation. The continuing problems in detecting mitigation deterrence in practice are noted. Different forms of moral hazard effect are distinguished, and the plausibility of mitigation galvanization considered. It is predicted that attention will turn to the situated, contingent expressions of mitigation deterrence and mitigation galvanization among different actors and at different scales; and to more sophisticated practical means to minimize the incidence and impacts of mitigation deterrence.",
keywords = "Climate engineering, Moral hazard, Mitigation deterrence, Climate policy, Research governance",
author = "Duncan McLaren",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1002/2016EF000445",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "596--602",
journal = "Earth's Future",
issn = "2328-4277",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mitigation deterrence and the "moral hazard" of solar radiation management

AU - McLaren, Duncan

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Fears of a moral hazard effect deterring mitigation have dogged solar radiation management (SRM) research since before 2006. Researchers have debated the significance and relevance of this concern from multiple disciplines and perspectives. This article explores this debate, highlighting the significance of policy goals and the actual and perceived substitutability of SRM for mitigation. The continuing problems in detecting mitigation deterrence in practice are noted. Different forms of moral hazard effect are distinguished, and the plausibility of mitigation galvanization considered. It is predicted that attention will turn to the situated, contingent expressions of mitigation deterrence and mitigation galvanization among different actors and at different scales; and to more sophisticated practical means to minimize the incidence and impacts of mitigation deterrence.

AB - Fears of a moral hazard effect deterring mitigation have dogged solar radiation management (SRM) research since before 2006. Researchers have debated the significance and relevance of this concern from multiple disciplines and perspectives. This article explores this debate, highlighting the significance of policy goals and the actual and perceived substitutability of SRM for mitigation. The continuing problems in detecting mitigation deterrence in practice are noted. Different forms of moral hazard effect are distinguished, and the plausibility of mitigation galvanization considered. It is predicted that attention will turn to the situated, contingent expressions of mitigation deterrence and mitigation galvanization among different actors and at different scales; and to more sophisticated practical means to minimize the incidence and impacts of mitigation deterrence.

KW - Climate engineering

KW - Moral hazard

KW - Mitigation deterrence

KW - Climate policy

KW - Research governance

U2 - 10.1002/2016EF000445

DO - 10.1002/2016EF000445

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 596

EP - 602

JO - Earth's Future

JF - Earth's Future

SN - 2328-4277

IS - 12

ER -