Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mobile life

Electronic data

  • MobileLife2013FINAL

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Science as Culture on 08/04/2013, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09505431.2013.776366

    Accepted author manuscript, 384 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Mobile life: biosecurity practices and insect globalization

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Mobile life: biosecurity practices and insect globalization. / Clark, Nigel.
In: Science as Culture, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2013, p. 16-37.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Clark N. Mobile life: biosecurity practices and insect globalization. Science as Culture. 2013;22(1):16-37. Epub 2013 Apr 8. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2013.776366

Author

Clark, Nigel. / Mobile life : biosecurity practices and insect globalization. In: Science as Culture. 2013 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 16-37.

Bibtex

@article{92f9514020b44e7e85a1ba0163521e34,
title = "Mobile life: biosecurity practices and insect globalization",
abstract = "Recent decades have seen a series of high-profile public health crises involving viruses, bacteria and other biological agents, together with escalating concern over impacts of biological invasion on crops and ecosystems. In the context of intensifying globalization, such hazards are being viewed as serious {\textquoteleft}security{\textquoteright} threats. For critical social theorists, this growing concern with biosecurity at the global scale has worrying implications, in that it promotes a state of fear over {\textquoteleft}life itself{\textquoteright} which is being used to justify heightened surveillance and increasingly intrusive intervention. However, there are alternative perspectives on living with adventitious and unpredictable biological life. For over a century and a half, {\textquoteleft}settler societies' such as Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia have been grappling with the environmental and economic impacts of non-native organisms running wild. Examining events surrounding an incursion of tussock moths in Auckland, it is argued that biosecurity policy can also be viewed as a flexible and evolving response to uncertainties associated with translocated biological life. Furthermore, the {\textquoteleft}peripheral{\textquoteright} tradition of sustained inquiry around the issue of which organisms belong in which places leads us back to questions about the characteristics of insects themselves and about the dynamics of the environments with which they interact. In this way, critical thinking around biosecurity is opened to a depth of engagement with evolutionary and geological processes that offer new dimensions to thinking about the {\textquoteleft}biopolitics' and {\textquoteleft}geopolitics' of encountering life out of bounds.",
keywords = "insects, biosecurity, bioinvasion, biopolitics, settler societies, globalization",
author = "Nigel Clark",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Science as Culture on 08/04/2013, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09505431.2013.776366",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/09505431.2013.776366",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "16--37",
journal = "Science as Culture",
issn = "0950-5431",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobile life

T2 - biosecurity practices and insect globalization

AU - Clark, Nigel

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Science as Culture on 08/04/2013, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09505431.2013.776366

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Recent decades have seen a series of high-profile public health crises involving viruses, bacteria and other biological agents, together with escalating concern over impacts of biological invasion on crops and ecosystems. In the context of intensifying globalization, such hazards are being viewed as serious ‘security’ threats. For critical social theorists, this growing concern with biosecurity at the global scale has worrying implications, in that it promotes a state of fear over ‘life itself’ which is being used to justify heightened surveillance and increasingly intrusive intervention. However, there are alternative perspectives on living with adventitious and unpredictable biological life. For over a century and a half, ‘settler societies' such as Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia have been grappling with the environmental and economic impacts of non-native organisms running wild. Examining events surrounding an incursion of tussock moths in Auckland, it is argued that biosecurity policy can also be viewed as a flexible and evolving response to uncertainties associated with translocated biological life. Furthermore, the ‘peripheral’ tradition of sustained inquiry around the issue of which organisms belong in which places leads us back to questions about the characteristics of insects themselves and about the dynamics of the environments with which they interact. In this way, critical thinking around biosecurity is opened to a depth of engagement with evolutionary and geological processes that offer new dimensions to thinking about the ‘biopolitics' and ‘geopolitics' of encountering life out of bounds.

AB - Recent decades have seen a series of high-profile public health crises involving viruses, bacteria and other biological agents, together with escalating concern over impacts of biological invasion on crops and ecosystems. In the context of intensifying globalization, such hazards are being viewed as serious ‘security’ threats. For critical social theorists, this growing concern with biosecurity at the global scale has worrying implications, in that it promotes a state of fear over ‘life itself’ which is being used to justify heightened surveillance and increasingly intrusive intervention. However, there are alternative perspectives on living with adventitious and unpredictable biological life. For over a century and a half, ‘settler societies' such as Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia have been grappling with the environmental and economic impacts of non-native organisms running wild. Examining events surrounding an incursion of tussock moths in Auckland, it is argued that biosecurity policy can also be viewed as a flexible and evolving response to uncertainties associated with translocated biological life. Furthermore, the ‘peripheral’ tradition of sustained inquiry around the issue of which organisms belong in which places leads us back to questions about the characteristics of insects themselves and about the dynamics of the environments with which they interact. In this way, critical thinking around biosecurity is opened to a depth of engagement with evolutionary and geological processes that offer new dimensions to thinking about the ‘biopolitics' and ‘geopolitics' of encountering life out of bounds.

KW - insects

KW - biosecurity

KW - bioinvasion

KW - biopolitics

KW - settler societies

KW - globalization

U2 - 10.1080/09505431.2013.776366

DO - 10.1080/09505431.2013.776366

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84876042670

VL - 22

SP - 16

EP - 37

JO - Science as Culture

JF - Science as Culture

SN - 0950-5431

IS - 1

ER -