Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Model building and assessment of the impact of ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Model building and assessment of the impact of covariates for disease prevalence mapping in low-resource settings

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Model building and assessment of the impact of covariates for disease prevalence mapping in low-resource settings. / Giorgi, Emanuele; Fronterre, Claudio; Macharia, Peter et al.
In: Interface, Vol. 18, No. 179, 20210104, 30.06.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{e1cd643b30724a41b626b6ee11f1ce76,
title = "Model building and assessment of the impact of covariates for disease prevalence mapping in low-resource settings",
abstract = "This paper provides statistical guidance on the development and application of model-based geostatistical methods for disease prevalence mapping. We illustrate the different stages of the analysis, from exploratory analysis to spatial prediction of prevalence, through a case study on malaria mapping in Tanzania. Throughout the paper, we distinguish between predictive modelling, whose main focus is on maximizing the predictive accuracy of the model, and explanatory modelling, where greater emphasis is placed on understanding the relationships between the health outcome and risk factors. We demonstrate that these two paradigms can result in different modelling choices. We also propose a simple approach for detecting over-fitting based on inspection of the correlation matrix of the estimators of the regression coefficients. To enhance the interpretability of geostatistical models, we introduce the concept of domain effects in order to assist variable selection and model validation. The statistical ideas and principles illustrated here in the specific context of disease prevalence mapping are more widely applicable to any regression model for the analysis of epidemiological outcomes but are particularly relevant to geostatistical models, for which the separation between fixed and random effects can be ambiguous.",
keywords = "Explanatory modelling, Prevalence, Predictive modelling, Disease mapping, Spatial correlation, Geostatistics",
author = "Emanuele Giorgi and Claudio Fronterre and Peter Macharia and Victor Alegana and Snow, {Robert W.} and Peter Diggle",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1098/rsif.2021.0104",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Interface",
issn = "1742-5689",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "179",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Model building and assessment of the impact of covariates for disease prevalence mapping in low-resource settings

AU - Giorgi, Emanuele

AU - Fronterre, Claudio

AU - Macharia, Peter

AU - Alegana, Victor

AU - Snow, Robert W.

AU - Diggle, Peter

PY - 2021/6/30

Y1 - 2021/6/30

N2 - This paper provides statistical guidance on the development and application of model-based geostatistical methods for disease prevalence mapping. We illustrate the different stages of the analysis, from exploratory analysis to spatial prediction of prevalence, through a case study on malaria mapping in Tanzania. Throughout the paper, we distinguish between predictive modelling, whose main focus is on maximizing the predictive accuracy of the model, and explanatory modelling, where greater emphasis is placed on understanding the relationships between the health outcome and risk factors. We demonstrate that these two paradigms can result in different modelling choices. We also propose a simple approach for detecting over-fitting based on inspection of the correlation matrix of the estimators of the regression coefficients. To enhance the interpretability of geostatistical models, we introduce the concept of domain effects in order to assist variable selection and model validation. The statistical ideas and principles illustrated here in the specific context of disease prevalence mapping are more widely applicable to any regression model for the analysis of epidemiological outcomes but are particularly relevant to geostatistical models, for which the separation between fixed and random effects can be ambiguous.

AB - This paper provides statistical guidance on the development and application of model-based geostatistical methods for disease prevalence mapping. We illustrate the different stages of the analysis, from exploratory analysis to spatial prediction of prevalence, through a case study on malaria mapping in Tanzania. Throughout the paper, we distinguish between predictive modelling, whose main focus is on maximizing the predictive accuracy of the model, and explanatory modelling, where greater emphasis is placed on understanding the relationships between the health outcome and risk factors. We demonstrate that these two paradigms can result in different modelling choices. We also propose a simple approach for detecting over-fitting based on inspection of the correlation matrix of the estimators of the regression coefficients. To enhance the interpretability of geostatistical models, we introduce the concept of domain effects in order to assist variable selection and model validation. The statistical ideas and principles illustrated here in the specific context of disease prevalence mapping are more widely applicable to any regression model for the analysis of epidemiological outcomes but are particularly relevant to geostatistical models, for which the separation between fixed and random effects can be ambiguous.

KW - Explanatory modelling

KW - Prevalence

KW - Predictive modelling

KW - Disease mapping

KW - Spatial correlation

KW - Geostatistics

U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2021.0104

DO - 10.1098/rsif.2021.0104

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

JO - Interface

JF - Interface

SN - 1742-5689

IS - 179

M1 - 20210104

ER -