Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Modelling the impact of respiratory syncytial v...

Electronic data

  • RSVNZ_models_Vaccine_R1

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vaccine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Vaccine, 39, 31, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.100

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.31 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Modelling the impact of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine and immunoprophylaxis strategies in New Zealand

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • N. Prasad
  • J.M. Read
  • C. Jewell
  • B. Waite
  • A.A. Trenholme
  • Q.S. Huang
  • C.C. Grant
  • E.C. Newbern
  • A.B. Hogan
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>13/07/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Vaccine
Issue number31
Volume39
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)4383-4390
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date17/06/21
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Background: Mathematical models of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) transmission can help describe seasonal epidemics and assess the impact of potential vaccines and immunoprophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Methods: We developed a deterministic, compartmental model for RSV transmission, which was fitted to population-based RSV hospital surveillance data from Auckland, New Zealand. The model simulated the introduction of either a maternal vaccine or a seasonal mAb among infants aged less than 6 months and estimated the reduction in RSV hospitalizations for a range of effectiveness and coverage values. Results: The model accurately reproduced the annual seasonality of RSV epidemics in Auckland. We found that a maternal vaccine with effectiveness of 30–40% in the first 90 days and 15–20% for the next 90 days could reduce RSV hospitalizations by 18–24% in children younger than 3 months, by 11–14% in children aged 3–5 months, and by 2–3% in children aged 6–23 months. A seasonal infant mAb with 40–60% effectiveness for 150 days could reduce RSV hospitalizations by 30–43%, 34–48% and by 14–21% in children aged 0–2 months, 3–5 months and 6–23 months, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that either a maternal RSV vaccine or mAb would effectively reduce RSV hospitalization disease burden in New Zealand. Overall, a seasonal mAb resulted in a larger disease prevention impact than a maternal vaccine.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vaccine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Vaccine, 39, 31, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.100