Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms. / Gönczy, L.; Csertán, G.; Urbanics, G. et al.
Collaborative Financial Infrastructure Protection: Tools, Abstractions, and Middleware. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2012. p. 99-116.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Gönczy, L, Csertán, G, Urbanics, G, Ghani, H, Khelil, A & Suri, N 2012, Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms. in Collaborative Financial Infrastructure Protection: Tools, Abstractions, and Middleware. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, pp. 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20420-3_5

APA

Gönczy, L., Csertán, G., Urbanics, G., Ghani, H., Khelil, A., & Suri, N. (2012). Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms. In Collaborative Financial Infrastructure Protection: Tools, Abstractions, and Middleware (pp. 99-116). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20420-3_5

Vancouver

Gönczy L, Csertán G, Urbanics G, Ghani H, Khelil A, Suri N. Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms. In Collaborative Financial Infrastructure Protection: Tools, Abstractions, and Middleware. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. 2012. p. 99-116 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20420-3_5

Author

Gönczy, L. ; Csertán, G. ; Urbanics, G. et al. / Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms. Collaborative Financial Infrastructure Protection: Tools, Abstractions, and Middleware. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2012. pp. 99-116

Bibtex

@inbook{209a64d8e84a4cff8140b42412464502,
title = "Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms",
abstract = "The CoMiFin framework can be considered as a highly dynamic controlled system that evolves over time according to SR interactions and the event processing activities performed within SRs. SR event processing requires the ability to allocate and manage online the resources that are necessary for the processing itself, and for meeting the SR business level objectives. These objectives are usually specified in the SR contracts as service level agreements. Accordingly, it is crucial to continuously monitor the operation of the CoMiFin framework in order to ensure its compliance with the specifications of the expected behavior. This chapter describes an efficient monitoring system that (a) collects vital infrastructure metrics (e.g., CPU/memory utilization) and application data (e.g., the number of processed events) from the set of resources and services used for event processing purposes, and (b) processes those metrics to detect violations of the SR contract. The monitoring architecture is model-driven so that changes in the resources or the system objectives can be automatically mapped to monitoring assets. It is implemented in a plugin-based fashion, which enables the flexible extension of evaluation features to capture the complex behavior of the system. {\textcopyright} Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012.",
keywords = "Application data, Controlled system, Efficient monitoring, Event Processing, Model-driven, Monitoring and evaluations, Monitoring architecture, Service Level Agreements, Semantics",
author = "L. G{\"o}nczy and G. Csert{\'a}n and G. Urbanics and H. Ghani and A. Khelil and Neeraj Suri",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-20420-3_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783642204203 ",
pages = "99--116",
booktitle = "Collaborative Financial Infrastructure Protection",
publisher = "Springer Berlin / Heidelberg",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Monitoring and evaluation of semantic rooms

AU - Gönczy, L.

AU - Csertán, G.

AU - Urbanics, G.

AU - Ghani, H.

AU - Khelil, A.

AU - Suri, Neeraj

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The CoMiFin framework can be considered as a highly dynamic controlled system that evolves over time according to SR interactions and the event processing activities performed within SRs. SR event processing requires the ability to allocate and manage online the resources that are necessary for the processing itself, and for meeting the SR business level objectives. These objectives are usually specified in the SR contracts as service level agreements. Accordingly, it is crucial to continuously monitor the operation of the CoMiFin framework in order to ensure its compliance with the specifications of the expected behavior. This chapter describes an efficient monitoring system that (a) collects vital infrastructure metrics (e.g., CPU/memory utilization) and application data (e.g., the number of processed events) from the set of resources and services used for event processing purposes, and (b) processes those metrics to detect violations of the SR contract. The monitoring architecture is model-driven so that changes in the resources or the system objectives can be automatically mapped to monitoring assets. It is implemented in a plugin-based fashion, which enables the flexible extension of evaluation features to capture the complex behavior of the system. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012.

AB - The CoMiFin framework can be considered as a highly dynamic controlled system that evolves over time according to SR interactions and the event processing activities performed within SRs. SR event processing requires the ability to allocate and manage online the resources that are necessary for the processing itself, and for meeting the SR business level objectives. These objectives are usually specified in the SR contracts as service level agreements. Accordingly, it is crucial to continuously monitor the operation of the CoMiFin framework in order to ensure its compliance with the specifications of the expected behavior. This chapter describes an efficient monitoring system that (a) collects vital infrastructure metrics (e.g., CPU/memory utilization) and application data (e.g., the number of processed events) from the set of resources and services used for event processing purposes, and (b) processes those metrics to detect violations of the SR contract. The monitoring architecture is model-driven so that changes in the resources or the system objectives can be automatically mapped to monitoring assets. It is implemented in a plugin-based fashion, which enables the flexible extension of evaluation features to capture the complex behavior of the system. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012.

KW - Application data

KW - Controlled system

KW - Efficient monitoring

KW - Event Processing

KW - Model-driven

KW - Monitoring and evaluations

KW - Monitoring architecture

KW - Service Level Agreements

KW - Semantics

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-20420-3_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-20420-3_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783642204203

SN - 9783642204197

SP - 99

EP - 116

BT - Collaborative Financial Infrastructure Protection

PB - Springer Berlin / Heidelberg

ER -