Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > More Harm than Good?

Electronic data

  • More harm than good ACCEPTED PRE-PROOF

    Rights statement: This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.19 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

More Harm than Good?: Cannabis, Harm and the Misuse of Drugs Act

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/12/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Drugs and Alcohol Today
Issue number4
Volume21
Number of pages12
Pages (from-to)277-288
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date24/11/21
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Purpose: To consider the nature of cannabis-related harms under the United Kingdom’s Misuse of Drugs Act (MDA). Written for the specific context of this four-paper special section on 50 years of the MDA, it argues that the MDA may cause more harm than it prevents.

Design/methodology/approach: An opinion piece offering a structured overview of cannabis-related harms under prohibition. It summarises existing evidence of the ways in which prohibition may exacerbate existing – and create new – harms related to the production, distribution, use and control of cannabis.

Findings: The paper argues that prohibition of cannabis under the MDA may cause more harm than it prevents.

Originality: It has long been argued that the MDA does not accurately or fairly reflect the harms of the substances it prohibits, and much existing research points to different ways in which drug prohibition can itself be harmful. The originality of this paper lies in bringing together these arguments and developing a framework for analysing the contribution of prohibition to drug-related harm.

Bibliographic note

This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.