TY - JOUR

T1 - Mother, researcher, feminist, woman

T2 - reflections on ‘maternal status’ as a researcher identity

AU - Frost, Nollaig

AU - Holt, Amanda

PY - 2014/7/31

Y1 - 2014/7/31

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this research paper is to discuss the ways in which a researcher’s maternal status as ‘mother’ or ‘non-mother/child-free’ is implicated in the research process.Design/methodology/approach - This paper draws on our experiences as two feminist researchers who each independently researched experiences of motherhood: one as a ‘mother’ and one as a ‘non-mother/child-free’. We draw on extracts from our original interview data and research diaries to reflect on how research topic, methodology and interview practice are shaped by a researcher’s maternal status.Findings - We found that our own maternal identities shaped the research process in a number of ways: it directed our research topic and access to research participants; it drove the method of data collection and analysis and it shaped how we interacted with our participants in the interview setting, notably through the performance of maternal identity. We conclude by examining how pervasive discourses of ‘good motherhood’ are both challenged and reproduced by a researcher’s maternal status and question the implications of this for feminist research.Originality/value - While much has been written about researcher ‘positionality’ and the impact of researcher identity on the research process, the ways in which a researcher’s ‘maternal status’ is implicated in the research process has been left largely unexamined. Yet, as this paper highlights, the interaction of the often-conflicting identities of ‘mother’, ‘researcher’, ‘feminist’ and ‘woman’ may shape the research process in subtle yet profound ways, raising important questions about the limits of what feminist social research about ‘motherhood’ can achieve.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this research paper is to discuss the ways in which a researcher’s maternal status as ‘mother’ or ‘non-mother/child-free’ is implicated in the research process.Design/methodology/approach - This paper draws on our experiences as two feminist researchers who each independently researched experiences of motherhood: one as a ‘mother’ and one as a ‘non-mother/child-free’. We draw on extracts from our original interview data and research diaries to reflect on how research topic, methodology and interview practice are shaped by a researcher’s maternal status.Findings - We found that our own maternal identities shaped the research process in a number of ways: it directed our research topic and access to research participants; it drove the method of data collection and analysis and it shaped how we interacted with our participants in the interview setting, notably through the performance of maternal identity. We conclude by examining how pervasive discourses of ‘good motherhood’ are both challenged and reproduced by a researcher’s maternal status and question the implications of this for feminist research.Originality/value - While much has been written about researcher ‘positionality’ and the impact of researcher identity on the research process, the ways in which a researcher’s ‘maternal status’ is implicated in the research process has been left largely unexamined. Yet, as this paper highlights, the interaction of the often-conflicting identities of ‘mother’, ‘researcher’, ‘feminist’ and ‘woman’ may shape the research process in subtle yet profound ways, raising important questions about the limits of what feminist social research about ‘motherhood’ can achieve.

KW - Feminist

KW - Identity

KW - Motherhood

KW - Positionality

U2 - 10.1108/QRJ-06-2013-0038

DO - 10.1108/QRJ-06-2013-0038

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 90

EP - 102

JO - Qualitative Research Journal

JF - Qualitative Research Journal

SN - 1448-0980

IS - 2

ER -