Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Moving Women Centre Stage

Electronic data

  • Moving submission ready for proofing

    Rights statement: © 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

    Accepted author manuscript, 562 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Moving Women Centre Stage: Structures of Feminist-Tragic Feeling

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>27/10/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Contemporary Drama in English
Issue number2
Volume5
Number of pages19
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In September 2015, Vicky Featherstone, Artistic Director of London’s Royal Court Theatre, was widely reported in the British press as commenting on the lack of female roles equivalent in stature to the tragic figures of Shakespeare’s Lear and Hamlet, or Miller’s Willy Loman. Her observation that audiences are more “comfortable” with a “male narrative” sparked considerable debate. My article engages with and develops this debate by turning a feminist gaze on two plays in Featherstone’s Royal Court repertoire: Penelope Skinner’s Linda and Zinnie Harris’s How to Hold Your Breath, both of which premiered in 2015. Mapping feminist thinking on to Raymond Williams’s reflections on “modern tragedy,” I conceive of a feminist-tragic feeling as crossing the divide between the political and the tragic. Formally, I argue this encourages a move away from the generically-bound categorisation of tragedy with its attendant definitions and theories, and makes it possible to think in more expansive, fluid, genre-crossing ways of what Rita Felski terms a “tragic sensibility.” Ultimately, through close readings of Linda and How to Hold Your Breath, I argue how each structures a feminist-tragic feeling for a world in which Western privilege has repeatedly failed to democratise.

Bibliographic note

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.