Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-objective airport slot scheduling incorporating operational delays and multi-stakeholder preferences
AU - Katsigiannis, Fotios A.
AU - Zografos, K. G.
PY - 2023/7/31
Y1 - 2023/7/31
N2 - Airport Slot Allocation (ASA) is a multi-objective, multi-stakeholder decision process that aims to maximise airport capacity utilisation and mitigate delays. Existing ASA studies have considered objectives associated with the slot scheduling process per se without considering the implications of the alternative schedules, represented by the generated efficient frontier, on the operational delays, i.e., the delays that will be encountered when a selected airport schedule will be implemented. Furthermore, one notes the absence of an integrated methodology that incorporates the preferences of all ASA stakeholders/experts in selecting the most preferable airport schedule. This gap becomes more evident when considering the dearth of empirical data with respect to ASA scheduling performance metrics. The ASA framework proposed herein taps the above gaps by considering operational delays and eliciting airport slot schedules through the integration of multi-stakeholder preferences. Computational results using empirical preference data demonstrate the decision-support in determining the most preferable airport slot scheduling solution (or solutions) and its implications on expected delays.
AB - Airport Slot Allocation (ASA) is a multi-objective, multi-stakeholder decision process that aims to maximise airport capacity utilisation and mitigate delays. Existing ASA studies have considered objectives associated with the slot scheduling process per se without considering the implications of the alternative schedules, represented by the generated efficient frontier, on the operational delays, i.e., the delays that will be encountered when a selected airport schedule will be implemented. Furthermore, one notes the absence of an integrated methodology that incorporates the preferences of all ASA stakeholders/experts in selecting the most preferable airport schedule. This gap becomes more evident when considering the dearth of empirical data with respect to ASA scheduling performance metrics. The ASA framework proposed herein taps the above gaps by considering operational delays and eliciting airport slot schedules through the integration of multi-stakeholder preferences. Computational results using empirical preference data demonstrate the decision-support in determining the most preferable airport slot scheduling solution (or solutions) and its implications on expected delays.
KW - Multi-objective optimisation
KW - Airport slot scheduling
KW - Airport scheduling
KW - Slot coordination
KW - Mixed integer programming
KW - Multi-criteria decision-making
KW - Operational delays
U2 - 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104156
DO - 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104156
M3 - Journal article
VL - 152
JO - Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
JF - Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
SN - 0968-090X
M1 - 104156
ER -