Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for po...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for post-processing a remotely sensed land cover classification

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for post-processing a remotely sensed land cover classification. / Tang, Yunwei; Atkinson, Peter M.; Wardrop, Nicola A. et al.
In: Spatial Statistics, Vol. 5, 08.2013, p. 69-84.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tang Y, Atkinson PM, Wardrop NA, Zhang J. Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for post-processing a remotely sensed land cover classification. Spatial Statistics. 2013 Aug;5:69-84. Epub 2013 May 13. doi: 10.1016/j.spasta.2013.04.005

Author

Tang, Yunwei ; Atkinson, Peter M. ; Wardrop, Nicola A. et al. / Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for post-processing a remotely sensed land cover classification. In: Spatial Statistics. 2013 ; Vol. 5. pp. 69-84.

Bibtex

@article{6a9b5cff5aba4d279fb941a5f77fdc15,
title = "Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for post-processing a remotely sensed land cover classification",
abstract = "A post-processing method for increasing the accuracy of a remote sensing classification was developed and tested based on the theory of multiple-point geostatistics. Training images are used to characterise the joint variability and joint continuity of a target spatial pattern, overcoming the limitations of two-point statistical models. Conditional multiple-point simulation (MPS) was applied to a land cover classification derived from a remotely sensed image. Training data were provided in the form of “hard” (land cover labels), and “soft” constraints (class probability surfaces estimated using soft classification). The MPS post-processing method was compared to two alternatives: traditional spatial filtering (also a post-processing method) and the contextual Markov random field (MRF) classifier. The MPS approach increased the accuracy of classification relative to these alternatives, primarily as a result of increasing the accuracy of classification for curvilinear classes. Key advantages of the MPS approach are that, unlike spatial filtering and the MRF classifier, (i) it incorporates a rich model of spatial correlation in the process of smoothing the spectral classification and (ii) it has the advantage of capturing and utilising class-specific spatial training patterns, for example, classes with curvilinear distributions.",
keywords = "Contextual classification, ultiple-point geostatistics, Conditional simulation, Bayes, Markov random fields",
author = "Yunwei Tang and Atkinson, {Peter M.} and Wardrop, {Nicola A.} and Jingxiong Zhang",
year = "2013",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.spasta.2013.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "69--84",
journal = "Spatial Statistics",
issn = "2211-6753",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for post-processing a remotely sensed land cover classification

AU - Tang, Yunwei

AU - Atkinson, Peter M.

AU - Wardrop, Nicola A.

AU - Zhang, Jingxiong

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - A post-processing method for increasing the accuracy of a remote sensing classification was developed and tested based on the theory of multiple-point geostatistics. Training images are used to characterise the joint variability and joint continuity of a target spatial pattern, overcoming the limitations of two-point statistical models. Conditional multiple-point simulation (MPS) was applied to a land cover classification derived from a remotely sensed image. Training data were provided in the form of “hard” (land cover labels), and “soft” constraints (class probability surfaces estimated using soft classification). The MPS post-processing method was compared to two alternatives: traditional spatial filtering (also a post-processing method) and the contextual Markov random field (MRF) classifier. The MPS approach increased the accuracy of classification relative to these alternatives, primarily as a result of increasing the accuracy of classification for curvilinear classes. Key advantages of the MPS approach are that, unlike spatial filtering and the MRF classifier, (i) it incorporates a rich model of spatial correlation in the process of smoothing the spectral classification and (ii) it has the advantage of capturing and utilising class-specific spatial training patterns, for example, classes with curvilinear distributions.

AB - A post-processing method for increasing the accuracy of a remote sensing classification was developed and tested based on the theory of multiple-point geostatistics. Training images are used to characterise the joint variability and joint continuity of a target spatial pattern, overcoming the limitations of two-point statistical models. Conditional multiple-point simulation (MPS) was applied to a land cover classification derived from a remotely sensed image. Training data were provided in the form of “hard” (land cover labels), and “soft” constraints (class probability surfaces estimated using soft classification). The MPS post-processing method was compared to two alternatives: traditional spatial filtering (also a post-processing method) and the contextual Markov random field (MRF) classifier. The MPS approach increased the accuracy of classification relative to these alternatives, primarily as a result of increasing the accuracy of classification for curvilinear classes. Key advantages of the MPS approach are that, unlike spatial filtering and the MRF classifier, (i) it incorporates a rich model of spatial correlation in the process of smoothing the spectral classification and (ii) it has the advantage of capturing and utilising class-specific spatial training patterns, for example, classes with curvilinear distributions.

KW - Contextual classification

KW - ultiple-point geostatistics

KW - Conditional simulation

KW - Bayes

KW - Markov random fields

U2 - 10.1016/j.spasta.2013.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.spasta.2013.04.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 69

EP - 84

JO - Spatial Statistics

JF - Spatial Statistics

SN - 2211-6753

ER -