Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > My Mainway Consultancy Report

Electronic data

  • Mainway-Consultancy-Report-2020-Final

    Final published version, 16.5 MB, PDF document

View graph of relations

My Mainway Consultancy Report

Research output: Book/Report/ProceedingsCommissioned report

Published

Standard

My Mainway Consultancy Report. / Calvo, Mirian; Perez Ojeda, David; Cruickshank, Leon.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2021. 56 p.

Research output: Book/Report/ProceedingsCommissioned report

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Calvo M, Perez Ojeda D, Cruickshank L. My Mainway Consultancy Report. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2021. 56 p.

Author

Bibtex

@book{27b8535dd9c94750bb9e0298a37f98d0,
title = "My Mainway Consultancy Report",
abstract = "The aim of the consultation project was to critically explore with Mainway residents the benefits and disadvantages of two options: rebuild (regeneration) or renovate (refurbishment) of the Mainway Estate. We gathered the residents' preferences on this matter in order to inform the decision-making process of Lancaster City Council (LCC). We engaged with 50% of the total households in Mainway, conducted 119 interviews at the doorstep, and generated over 260 participant interactions in total. The gathering of data has captured over 3500 data points, systematically analysed following thematic analysis. ",
keywords = "Participatory architecture, co-design, community engagement, community architecture",
author = "Mirian Calvo and {Perez Ojeda}, David and Leon Cruickshank",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "31",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - My Mainway Consultancy Report

AU - Calvo, Mirian

AU - Perez Ojeda, David

AU - Cruickshank, Leon

PY - 2021/3/31

Y1 - 2021/3/31

N2 - The aim of the consultation project was to critically explore with Mainway residents the benefits and disadvantages of two options: rebuild (regeneration) or renovate (refurbishment) of the Mainway Estate. We gathered the residents' preferences on this matter in order to inform the decision-making process of Lancaster City Council (LCC). We engaged with 50% of the total households in Mainway, conducted 119 interviews at the doorstep, and generated over 260 participant interactions in total. The gathering of data has captured over 3500 data points, systematically analysed following thematic analysis.

AB - The aim of the consultation project was to critically explore with Mainway residents the benefits and disadvantages of two options: rebuild (regeneration) or renovate (refurbishment) of the Mainway Estate. We gathered the residents' preferences on this matter in order to inform the decision-making process of Lancaster City Council (LCC). We engaged with 50% of the total households in Mainway, conducted 119 interviews at the doorstep, and generated over 260 participant interactions in total. The gathering of data has captured over 3500 data points, systematically analysed following thematic analysis.

KW - Participatory architecture

KW - co-design

KW - community engagement

KW - community architecture

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - My Mainway Consultancy Report

PB - Lancaster University

CY - Lancaster

ER -