Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech

Electronic data

  • NasalCoart_VocalEffort_Accepted

    Accepted author manuscript, 750 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech. / Lo, Justin J. H.
In: Speech Communication, Vol. 169, 103205, 30.04.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lo JJH. Nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech. Speech Communication. 2025 Apr 30;169:103205. Epub 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2025.103205

Author

Lo, Justin J. H. / Nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech. In: Speech Communication. 2025 ; Vol. 169.

Bibtex

@article{ddfdce52e6a649c091366fce250182e7,
title = "Nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech",
abstract = "Speaking in noisy environments entails a multitude of adaptations to speech production. Such modifications are expected to reduce gestural overlap between neighbouring sounds in order to enhance their distinctiveness, yet evidence for reduced coarticulation has been ambiguous. Nasal coarticulation in particular presents an unusual case, as it has been suggested to increase instead in certain clear speech conditions. The current study presents an experiment aimed at investigating how use of nasal coarticulation varies in quiet and noisy speech conditions. Speakers of Southern British English were recorded using a nasometer in an interactive reading task and produced monosyllabic target words with vowels bound by combinations of stop and nasal consonants. Use of nasal coarticulation was compared by means of a normalised measure that takes into account the speaker- and vowel-specific range of nasalisation available in each condition. In two noisy conditions where the interlocutor was either visible or not, vowel nasality in coarticulatory contexts was found to decrease in a way that closely tracked the compressed range between oral and nasal baselines. Speakers thus maintained their use of nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech, especially in the anticipatory direction. These findings suggest that the spreading of the velum lowering gesture from nasal consonants to neighbouring vowels is not targeted for adaptation in Lombard speech. They further reaffirm that enhancing acoustic distinctiveness and maintaining coarticulation are joint, compatible goals in the production of hyperarticulated speech.",
author = "Lo, {Justin J. H.}",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.specom.2025.103205",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
journal = "Speech Communication",
issn = "0167-6393",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech

AU - Lo, Justin J. H.

PY - 2025/4/30

Y1 - 2025/4/30

N2 - Speaking in noisy environments entails a multitude of adaptations to speech production. Such modifications are expected to reduce gestural overlap between neighbouring sounds in order to enhance their distinctiveness, yet evidence for reduced coarticulation has been ambiguous. Nasal coarticulation in particular presents an unusual case, as it has been suggested to increase instead in certain clear speech conditions. The current study presents an experiment aimed at investigating how use of nasal coarticulation varies in quiet and noisy speech conditions. Speakers of Southern British English were recorded using a nasometer in an interactive reading task and produced monosyllabic target words with vowels bound by combinations of stop and nasal consonants. Use of nasal coarticulation was compared by means of a normalised measure that takes into account the speaker- and vowel-specific range of nasalisation available in each condition. In two noisy conditions where the interlocutor was either visible or not, vowel nasality in coarticulatory contexts was found to decrease in a way that closely tracked the compressed range between oral and nasal baselines. Speakers thus maintained their use of nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech, especially in the anticipatory direction. These findings suggest that the spreading of the velum lowering gesture from nasal consonants to neighbouring vowels is not targeted for adaptation in Lombard speech. They further reaffirm that enhancing acoustic distinctiveness and maintaining coarticulation are joint, compatible goals in the production of hyperarticulated speech.

AB - Speaking in noisy environments entails a multitude of adaptations to speech production. Such modifications are expected to reduce gestural overlap between neighbouring sounds in order to enhance their distinctiveness, yet evidence for reduced coarticulation has been ambiguous. Nasal coarticulation in particular presents an unusual case, as it has been suggested to increase instead in certain clear speech conditions. The current study presents an experiment aimed at investigating how use of nasal coarticulation varies in quiet and noisy speech conditions. Speakers of Southern British English were recorded using a nasometer in an interactive reading task and produced monosyllabic target words with vowels bound by combinations of stop and nasal consonants. Use of nasal coarticulation was compared by means of a normalised measure that takes into account the speaker- and vowel-specific range of nasalisation available in each condition. In two noisy conditions where the interlocutor was either visible or not, vowel nasality in coarticulatory contexts was found to decrease in a way that closely tracked the compressed range between oral and nasal baselines. Speakers thus maintained their use of nasal coarticulation in Lombard speech, especially in the anticipatory direction. These findings suggest that the spreading of the velum lowering gesture from nasal consonants to neighbouring vowels is not targeted for adaptation in Lombard speech. They further reaffirm that enhancing acoustic distinctiveness and maintaining coarticulation are joint, compatible goals in the production of hyperarticulated speech.

U2 - 10.1016/j.specom.2025.103205

DO - 10.1016/j.specom.2025.103205

M3 - Journal article

VL - 169

JO - Speech Communication

JF - Speech Communication

SN - 0167-6393

M1 - 103205

ER -